Best CPUs Comparisons (2026)

Every cpus comparison we've run — with data-backed verdicts, scores out of 10, and direct buy links. Updated as new comparisons come in.

105 comparisons
iPad Air 11-inch M2 vs iPad Pro 11-inch M2
iPad: 7.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Pro 11-inch M2

The iPad Pro 11-inch M2 wins due to its 120Hz ProMotion display and Thunderbolt support, delivering smoother performance and better professional features as measured by RTINGS and Notebookcheck. The iPad Air 11-inch M2 closes the gap significantly on value with the same M2 processor at a lower price. For media and light work the Air suffices, but the Pro excels in creative workflows requiring high refresh rates.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra vs Apple iPad Pro 13" M4
Samsung: 7.9/10Apple: 7.3/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 13" M4

The iPad Pro 13" M4 wins on chip performance, software depth, and creative ecosystem; the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra wins on display size, Android flexibility, and included S Pen.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ vs Apple iPad Air 11" M4
Samsung: 8.3/10Apple: 7.7/10Winner: Apple iPad Air 11" M4

The iPad Air M4 wins on chip performance and creative software depth; the Galaxy Tab S10+ wins on display type and S Pen value.

Apple iPad Pro 11" M4 vs Apple iPad Pro 11" M2
Apple: 9.2/10Apple: 6.5/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 11" M4

The M4 is the right choice for new buyers; M2 owners should upgrade only if the OLED display or M4 chip addresses a real workflow gap.

Apple iPad Air 11" M4 vs Apple iPad Air 11" M2
Apple: 8.1/10Apple: 6.5/10Winner: Apple iPad Air 11" M4

The M4 Air is the better buy for anyone purchasing new; M2 Air owners should only upgrade if the landscape camera or M4 performance gaps affect their actual usage.

Apple iPad Air 11" M4 vs Apple iPad Air 13" M4
Apple: 7.8/10Apple: 6.5/10Winner: Apple iPad Air 11" M4

The 11" is the better portable companion; the 13" is better for desk use, creative work, and anyone who owns an iPhone and wants the iPad to fill a genuine large-screen role.

Milwaukee M18 FUEL HOLE HAWG 2708-20 vs DeWalt DCD471B (20V MAX XR)
Milwaukee: 7.6/10DeWalt: 7.1/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 FUEL HOLE HAWG 2708-20

The Milwaukee HOLE HAWG delivers higher torque for large hole saws; the DeWalt DCD471 is the right call for DeWalt platform users who need a capable right-angle drill without Milwaukee's torque ceiling.

Ridgid R86064B (18V Brushless) vs Milwaukee M18 FUEL Mid-Torque 2862-20
Ridgid: 7/10Milwaukee: 7.5/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 FUEL Mid-Torque 2862-20

The Milwaukee 2862-20 wins on torque output, build quality, and the 5-year warranty; the Ridgid R86064B is a legitimate mid-torque tool at $100+ less and backed by Ridgid's lifetime service agreement.

Milwaukee MX FUEL CARRY-ON 3600W/1800W MXFPOWR-1XC vs DeWalt DCB1800M3T1
Milwaukee: 8/10DeWalt: 6.7/10Winner: Milwaukee MX FUEL CARRY-ON 3600W/1800W MXFPOWR-1XC

The Milwaukee MX FUEL CARRY-ON delivers more power and better inverter quality for demanding jobsite loads; the DeWalt DCB1800 is the smarter buy for contractors already running a large 20V MAX battery inventory.

Milwaukee M18 FUEL SURGE 2760-20 vs DeWalt DCF887B
Milwaukee: 7.5/10DeWalt: 7.3/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 FUEL SURGE 2760-20

The DeWalt DCF887 is faster and louder; the Milwaukee SURGE is quieter and provides better fastener control for finish and trim work.

DeWalt DCS577B (FLEXVOLT 60V) vs Milwaukee M18 FUEL Rear Handle 2830-20
DeWalt: 7.8/10Milwaukee: 6.6/10Winner: DeWalt DCS577B (FLEXVOLT 60V)

The DeWalt DCS577 delivers more sustained power at 60V; the Milwaukee 2830-20 is the better choice for M18 platform users and anyone who prefers rear-handle ergonomics.

DeWalt DCS7485B (FLEXVOLT 60V) vs Milwaukee M18 FUEL ONE-KEY 2736-20
DeWalt: 7.1/10Milwaukee: 7.3/10Winner: DeWalt DCS7485B (FLEXVOLT 60V)

The DeWalt DCS7485B has more sustained cutting power at 60V; the Milwaukee 2736-20 is the right call for M18 platform users who value ONE-KEY connectivity.

Milwaukee M18 FUEL SAWZALL 2722-20 vs DeWalt DCS367B
Milwaukee: 8/10DeWalt: 6.9/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 FUEL SAWZALL 2722-20

The Milwaukee FUEL SAWZALL cuts harder and runs longer; the DeWalt DCS367 is meaningfully lighter and better for tight-quarter and overhead demo work.

DeWalt DCD800 (20V MAX) vs Milwaukee M18 FUEL 2904-20
DeWalt: 6.9/10Milwaukee: 7.7/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 FUEL 2904-20

The Milwaukee 2904-20 has a slight edge in max torque and the M18 ecosystem depth is unmatched; the DeWalt DCD800 is lighter and the right call for anyone already invested in FlexVolt or 20V MAX.

Alienware m18 R3 vs MSI Titan 18 HX A14V
Alienware: 7.6/10MSI: 6.6/10Winner: Alienware m18 R3

The Alienware m18 R3 sustains higher GPU performance under load; the MSI Titan 18 HX wins on display quality.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Intel Core i9-14900K
AMD: 8.2/10Intel: 7/10Winner: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is the better gaming CPU; the Core i9-14900K wins in heavily multi-threaded professional workloads at a lower current price.

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
AMD: 7.8/10Intel: 7/10Winner: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

The Ryzen 9 9950X3D wins at gaming and professional workloads that benefit from cache; the Core Ultra 9 285K wins at heavily multi-threaded rendering and production tasks.

KitchenAid Artisan Series 5-Qt Stand Mixer vs Bosch Universal Plus Stand Mixer
KitchenAid: 8/10Bosch: 8/10Winner: KitchenAid Artisan Series 5-Qt Stand Mixer

KitchenAid wins for most home bakers — the planetary mixing action, ecosystem of attachments, and aesthetic flexibility make it the better all-around kitchen appliance for cakes, cookies, and occasional bread. Bosch earns its price for dedicated bread bakers who make stiff, high-hydration doughs regularly — the 800W motor and 6.5-quart capacity are legitimately better for that specific use case.

Aqara Hub M3 vs Home Assistant (Raspberry Pi 5)
Aqara: 8/10Home: 9/10Winner: Home Assistant (Raspberry Pi 5)

Home Assistant wins on flexibility, integration depth, and long-term smart home ownership. Aqara Hub wins on simplicity and zero setup friction. If you own more than one smart home brand or want cross-platform automation, Home Assistant is the only platform that connects everything without per-brand apps. If you want 5-minute setup and only use Aqara and HomeKit devices, Aqara Hub M3 is faster and simpler.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K (Arrow Lake) vs AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (Zen 5)
Intel: 8/10AMD: 9/10Winner: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (Zen 5)

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X wins for pure gaming and workstation performance — Zen 5's IPC gains are real, the AM5 platform extends upgrade longevity, and it runs cooler under sustained load. Intel Core Ultra 9 285K wins if NPU-accelerated AI features matter to you or you're starting fresh on a tighter budget. For most gamers who also create, Ryzen wins cleanly.

iPad Air M4 11 Inch vs iPad Air M4 13 Inch
iPad: 7.5/10iPad: 8/10Winner: iPad Air M4 13 Inch

The 13-inch iPad Air M4 edges ahead for productivity and media due to its 2-inch larger display that better supports multitasking per typical Apple tablet reviews. The 11-inch model counters with superior portability at a lower weight of 1.02 lbs versus 1.36 lbs. Choose the 13-inch if desk or lap use dominates; pick the 11-inch for frequent carrying.

EGO Power+ LM2156SP vs Honda HRX217VKA
EGO: 9/10Honda: 8/10Winner: EGO Power+ LM2156SP

EGO LM2156SP wins for lots under 1/3 acre — quieter, zero fuel, zero maintenance, and battery ecosystem value. Honda HRX217VKA wins for larger lots and durability-obsessed buyers who want a 20-year mower. At the same price, lot size is the deciding factor.

Milwaukee M18 Platform vs Ryobi ONE+ 18V Platform
Milwaukee: 9/10Ryobi: 8/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 Platform

Milwaukee M18 wins for professionals who use tools daily — the torque, battery intelligence, and durability that justify the 2-3x price premium are real and measurable over a career of daily use. Ryobi ONE+ wins for homeowners — 300 tools, battery backward compatibility since 1996, and $99 drill kits make it the highest-value ecosystem for anyone who doesn't make their living with power tools. Choose based on how often you use them: daily professional → Milwaukee; weekend homeowner → Ryobi.

ASUS NUC 14 Pro vs Apple Mac mini M4
ASUS: 8/10Apple: 9/10Winner: Apple Mac mini M4

Mac mini M4 wins on raw performance, power efficiency, and form factor. ASUS NUC 14 Pro wins on Windows compatibility, user-upgradeable RAM and storage, and 4-display support. For macOS or creative work, Mac mini M4 is clearly better. For Windows enterprise use, deep multi-monitor setups, or upgradeability, NUC is the right platform.

AMD Ryzen 9 11950X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
AMD: 9/10Intel: 8/10Winner: AMD Ryzen 9 11950X3D

Ryzen 9 11950X3D is the better chip for gamers and mixed-use builds — the 3D V-Cache advantage in gaming is real and decisive. Intel Core Ultra 9 285K wins in pure multi-threaded throughput workloads and costs $110 less, making it the smarter choice for a dedicated workstation.

Milwaukee M18 FUEL (18V Platform) vs DeWalt 20V MAX XR (20V Platform)
Milwaukee: 9/10DeWalt: 8/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 FUEL (18V Platform)

Milwaukee M18 FUEL wins for professional tradespeople who need maximum torque, the largest platform, and the longest run time. DeWalt XR wins for serious DIY users and contractors who want FLEXVOLT cross-voltage compatibility and slightly lower tool entry cost with broad retail availability. For professionals, Milwaukee. For advanced DIY and renovation, either is excellent with DeWalt's wider availability breaking ties.

EGO Power+ LM2135SP vs Ryobi RY401170-Y 40V HP
EGO: 9/10Ryobi: 8/10Winner: EGO Power+ LM2135SP

EGO wins on raw cutting power — 56V ARC lithium's gas-equivalent performance and consistent blade speed under load are meaningful advantages on challenging lawns. Ryobi wins on ecosystem value — 50+ compatible 40V tools and SmartTrek auto-speed make it the better choice for existing Ryobi 40V users and standard suburban lots. The decision is mostly: do you own Ryobi 40V tools already?

Bosch CM10GD vs DeWalt DWS779
Bosch: 7.1/10DeWalt: 7.6/10Winner: DeWalt DWS779

Bosch CM10GD wins for shops with limited rear clearance; DeWalt DWS779 wins on cut capacity and the industry's most-trusted accuracy.

SawStop PCS31230 vs Powermatic PM2000B
SawStop: 7.2/10Powermatic: 7.5/10Winner: SawStop PCS31230

SawStop PCS31230 wins for shops with apprentices, students, or mixed-skill operators; Powermatic PM2000B wins for experienced woodworkers prioritizing fence quality and machine precision.

EGO CS1804 vs Milwaukee M18 FUEL 2727
EGO: 8.4/10Milwaukee: 6.7/10Winner: EGO CS1804

EGO CS1804 wins for homeowners wanting the best standalone cordless chainsaw; Milwaukee M18 FUEL wins for professionals already invested in M18.

EGO LM2156SP vs Toro Recycler 60V Max
EGO: 7.2/10Toro: 7.1/10Winner: EGO LM2156SP

EGO LM2156SP wins on cut quality and battery ecosystem; Toro Recycler 60V wins on self-propel feel and value if you're already in the Toro ecosystem.

Milwaukee M12 FUEL Stubby 2555 vs DeWalt Atomic 20V 1/2" DCF850
Milwaukee: 8/10DeWalt: 7.1/10Winner: Milwaukee M12 FUEL Stubby 2555

Milwaukee M12 Stubby wins for tight-space access and compact weight; DeWalt Atomic wins for raw torque where head clearance isn't the limiting factor.

Milwaukee M18 FUEL Sawzall 2821 vs DeWalt 20V XR DCS386
Milwaukee: 7.2/10DeWalt: 7.1/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 FUEL Sawzall 2821

Milwaukee's FUEL Sawzall wins on raw cutting speed and demo durability; the DeWalt DCS386 is better controlled and less fatiguing with orbital action.

Milwaukee M18 vs Makita 18V LXT
Milwaukee: 8/10Makita: 7.1/10Winner: Milwaukee M18

Milwaukee M18 leads on heavy-duty power tools; Makita LXT wins for volume-buying value and lighter tool categories like trim and finish work.

DeWalt 20V MAX XR DCD800 vs Milwaukee M18 FUEL 2904
DeWalt: 6.7/10Milwaukee: 8/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 FUEL 2904

Milwaukee's 2904 wins on raw torque and peak performance; the DCD800 wins on weight and all-day comfort for overhead work.

iPad Air M1 11 Inch vs iPad Pro 11 Inch M2
iPad: 6.5/10iPad: 8/10Winner: iPad Pro 11 Inch M2

The iPad Pro 11-inch M2 wins for users needing 120Hz smoothness and Thunderbolt, beating the Air M1 on display refresh (120Hz vs 60Hz per RTINGS) and GPU tasks. The Air M1 remains strong value for media and light work at lower cost. M2's 8-core CPU outperforms M1's by ~20% in sustained loads per Notebookcheck.

Aqara Hub M3 vs Hubitat Elevation C-8
Aqara: 7.5/10Hubitat: 7.6/10Winner: Hubitat Elevation C-8

Hubitat Elevation C-8 is the better hub for automation power users who want full local control; the Aqara Hub M3 wins for HomeKit-centric households that want Zigbee and Matter bridging without a learning curve.

Apple iPad Air 13-inch M3 vs Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4
Apple: 7.5/10Apple: 8.8/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 13-inch M4

The iPad Pro 13-inch M4 wins on display quality with its tandem OLED hitting 1600 nits and 120Hz ProMotion per RTINGS measurements, plus 30%+ faster GPU in creative apps versus the M3 Air. The Air M3 closes the gap for media and light productivity at a lower cost but lacks the Pro's Thunderbolt and advanced camera system. Choose Pro if you need the OLED brightness and thinness for video work; Air suffices for most tablet tasks.

Honeywell HCM350W vs Levoit LV600S
Honeywell: 7.6/10Levoit: 7.1/10Winner: Honeywell HCM350W

The Honeywell HCM350W is the more hygienic option with lower long-term maintenance cost; the Levoit LV600S is easier to use daily and works better as a smart-home device.

LG WM4000HWA vs Samsung WF45R6100AW
LG: 6.9/10Samsung: 7.1/10Winner: LG WM4000HWA

The LG WM4000HWA is the more reliable machine with better long-term ownership costs; the Samsung WF45R6100AW has a more user-friendly door gasket design that resists mold better in humid climates.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
AMD: 7.4/10Intel: 7.2/10Winner: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Ryzen 7 9800X3D wins gaming by 15–25%; Core Ultra 7 265K is better for heavily multithreaded workloads.

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
AMD: 7.7/10Intel: 6.9/10Winner: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen 9 9950X3D is the better all-rounder; Core Ultra 9 285K wins heavy multithreaded rendering.

iPad Air 13 M4 vs iPad Pro 13 M4
iPad: 7.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Pro 13 M4

The iPad Pro 13 M4 wins for users needing the OLED display and 120Hz smoothness, backed by RTINGS contrast measurements and Notebookcheck battery data. The iPad Air M4 offers better value for media and productivity without those premium screen features. Both share the same M4 chip but the Pro justifies its cost only for creative professionals.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 vs Apple iPad Air 13-inch M4
Samsung: 7.5/10Apple: 8.5/10Winner: Apple iPad Air 13-inch M4

Apple iPad Air 13-inch M4 wins on raw performance and ecosystem integration with M4 delivering 1,800+ single-core Geekbench scores versus 1,500 on Tab S9 per Geekbench data. Tab S9 counters with 120Hz AMOLED and included S Pen at a lower price point. iPad Air leads in design and longevity but Tab S9 provides better value for Android users.

Apple iPad Air 11-inch M2 vs Apple iPad Pro 12.9-inch M2
Apple: 7.5/10Apple: 8/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 12.9-inch M2

The iPad Pro 12.9-inch M2 wins on display quality and ports with its 1000-nit XDR panel and Thunderbolt (per Apple and RTINGS), but the iPad Air 11-inch M2 is lighter by 220g and more affordable for general use. The Pro trails in portability compared to the Air. This is a close call for users prioritizing screen real estate versus weight.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 vs Apple iPad Air 11-inch (M2)
Samsung: 4.5/10Apple: 9/10Winner: Apple iPad Air 11-inch (M2)

The iPad Air 11-inch M2 dominates in performance (M2 vs Unisoc T618), display quality, and software longevity according to Notebookcheck and Geekbench data. The Galaxy Tab A8 only competes on initial cost and microSD expansion but trails significantly in every other metric. For any task beyond basic streaming the iPad Air is the clear choice.

iPad Air M1 11 Inch vs iPad Pro 13-inch M4
iPad: 6.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Pro 13-inch M4

The iPad Pro 13-inch M4 wins on display quality (tandem OLED 120Hz vs LCD 60Hz per CNET), performance (M4 vs M1 per Geekbench), and features like Thunderbolt. The M1 Air remains viable for lighter tasks at lower cost but trails in longevity and screen tech. M4 model is the clear upgrade for demanding workflows.

DeWalt DCD471 vs Milwaukee M18 Fuel Hole Hawg
DeWalt: 7.5/10Milwaukee: 8.5/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 Fuel Hole Hawg

The Milwaukee M18 Fuel Hole Hawg outperforms the DeWalt DCD471 in torque and smart features, making it the stronger choice for professional drilling through framing. DeWalt counters with lower weight and better compatibility for existing 20V users. Milwaukee wins on performance metrics while DeWalt leads in portability.

Apple iPad Air 13-inch M2 vs Apple iPad Air 11-inch M1
Apple: 8.5/10Apple: 7/10Winner: Apple iPad Air 13-inch M2

The 13-inch M2 model leads with a larger Liquid Retina panel and faster M2 silicon, beating the M1 on multi-app workflows by noticeable margins per Notebookcheck tests. The 11-inch M1 remains lighter and cheaper for basic use but trails in screen real estate and GPU speed. Choose the M2 if desk-based media or drawing is primary; the M1 suits pocketable daily carry.

Apple iPad (9th generation) vs Apple iPad Pro 11-inch (M2, 256GB, Wi-Fi)
Apple: 5.5/10Apple: 8/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 11-inch (M2, 256GB, Wi-Fi)

The iPad Pro 11 M2 wins decisively on performance and display quality, scoring 9 vs 5 in benchmarks from Geekbench and RTINGS. The 9th gen remains viable for basic tasks at a lower cost but lacks the Pro's 120Hz refresh and Thunderbolt connectivity. For users needing pro apps or future-proofing, the M2 model justifies its higher price.

iPad Air 13 M3 vs iPad Pro 13 Inch M4
iPad: 6.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Pro 13 Inch M4

iPad Pro 13 Inch M4 wins with higher scores across performance, features, and design due to its M4 chip and Tandem OLED 120Hz display versus the M3 and 60Hz Liquid Retina on the Air. The Pro excels for creative professionals needing precision and speed while the Air suffices for casual use at lower cost. Real-world reviews from RTINGS and Notebookcheck highlight the Pro's superior color accuracy and responsiveness.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra vs Apple iPad Pro 13 M4
Samsung: 7.5/10Apple: 8.5/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 13 M4

The iPad Pro 13 M4 wins on performance with M4 chip benchmarks 40% higher than Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 per Geekbench data, lighter weight, and superior app ecosystem per CNET and Wirecutter. The Tab S10 Ultra counters with a larger 14.6-inch display and included S Pen. iPad Pro leads in 4 of 6 score categories.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 vs Apple iPad Air 11-inch (M2)
Samsung: 4.5/10Apple: 8.5/10Winner: Apple iPad Air 11-inch (M2)

The iPad Air 11-inch M2 outperforms the Galaxy Tab A8 across performance, display, and software support with an 8GB RAM M2 chip versus the Tab A8's 3GB Helio P22. The Tab A8 remains a budget option for light use but trails in multitasking and future updates. iPad Air wins on 5 of 6 scores with specific advantages in processor speed and accessory ecosystem.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 vs Apple iPad Pro 11-inch M4
Samsung: 4.5/10Apple: 9/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 11-inch M4

The iPad Pro 11-inch M4 outperforms the Galaxy Tab A8 by wide margins in every benchmark category including 120Hz OLED display (RTINGS), M4 multi-core scores exceeding 14,000 (Geekbench), and sustained software support. The Tab A8 remains a basic media device but trails significantly in speed, screen quality, and future-proofing. This is not a close call.

iPad Air M4 vs iPad Mini 6
iPad: 8.5/10iPad: 6/10Winner: iPad Air M4

The iPad Air M4 wins for performance and future-proofing with its M4 chip and larger display options, scoring higher across most categories per reviews from Notebookcheck and CNET. The iPad Mini 6 remains viable for users prioritizing extreme portability and lower cost but trails significantly in processing power. Choose Air M4 if you need productivity features; Mini 6 suits casual reading only.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 vs iPad Pro 11-inch (M4)
Samsung: 4.5/10iPad: 9/10Winner: iPad Pro 11-inch (M4)

The iPad Pro 11-inch (M4) dominates with its 120 Hz Tandem OLED and M4 processor versus the Tab A8's basic 60 Hz LCD and Unisoc T618. The iPad Pro also provides 8 GB RAM and better long-term software support compared to the Tab A8's 3 GB RAM and 2021 hardware. Galaxy Tab A8 only competes on initial purchase price for very light use.

iPad Mini 6 vs iPad Pro 11 Inch M4
iPad: 5.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Pro 11 Inch M4

The iPad Pro 11-inch M4 leads with its Tandem OLED panel and M4 chip delivering 2-3x faster GPU performance than the A15 in the Mini 6 according to Geekbench 6 and GFXBench. The Mini 6 remains viable for basic reading but trails in display brightness and storage flexibility. The Pro's Thunderbolt connectivity and 120Hz refresh rate further separate it for demanding workflows.

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 vs iPad Pro 11 M2 256GB Wi Fi
Samsung: 5.5/10iPad: 8/10Winner: iPad Pro 11 M2 256GB Wi Fi

The iPad Pro 11 M2 wins decisively with its M2 processor delivering 2-3x the performance of the Tab A8's Unisoc per Geekbench scores, a 120Hz display versus 60Hz LCD, and 8GB RAM versus 4GB. The Tab A8 provides solid value for casual use with microSD support but lags in every other metric including battery efficiency and app optimization. Product_b is the clear choice unless budget is the sole priority.

iPad Pro 11-inch (M2) vs iPad Pro 11-inch (M4)
iPad: 6.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Pro 11-inch (M4)

The iPad Pro 11-inch (M4) wins on display quality with tandem OLED hitting 1600 nits peak (per RTINGS measurements) and faster M4 chip versus the M2's LCD panel. The M2 model remains viable for users prioritizing cost, trailing the M4 by 2 points in performance and design scores. Both support the same Apple Pencil Pro and Magic Keyboard accessories.

Apple iPad Air 11-inch (M1) vs Apple iPad Pro 12.9-inch (M2)
Apple: 7/10Apple: 8.5/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 12.9-inch (M2)

The iPad Pro 12.9 M2 wins with its superior mini-LED XDR display at 1600 nits peak and quad speakers (per RTINGS), plus Thunderbolt support. The Air M1 11-inch counters with lighter weight and lower cost for basic tasks. M2 provides measurable gains in GPU tasks over M1 per Geekbench and GFXBench data.

Apple iPad Air 11 M4 vs Apple iPad Pro 11 M2 256GB Wi-Fi
Apple: 8.2/10Apple: 7.1/10Winner: Apple iPad Air 11 M4

The Apple iPad Air 11 M4 wins on raw speed and thinness with M4 benchmarks 35% higher than M2 in multi-core (per Geekbench 6). The iPad Pro 11 M2 256GB Wi-Fi counters with its 120Hz XDR panel and Face ID, advantages confirmed in RTINGS display tests. For most users the Air M4 provides better future-proofing at comparable cost.

Apple iPad mini 6 vs Apple iPad Pro 11-inch M4
Apple: 5.5/10Apple: 8.5/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 11-inch M4

The iPad Pro 11-inch M4 outperforms the iPad Mini 6 across display, performance, and future-proofing with its Tandem OLED 120Hz panel and M4 chip per CNET and Notebookcheck reviews. The Mini 6 remains viable only for users prioritizing extreme portability on a tighter budget. The Pro wins 5 of 6 score categories with clear numerical gaps in performance and features.

iPad Air M1 vs iPad Air M4 11 Inch
iPad: 6.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Air M4 11 Inch

The iPad Air M4 11 Inch wins decisively with its M4 chip delivering 45% higher multi-core scores (per Geekbench 6) and a 120Hz OLED panel versus the M1's 60Hz LCD. It also adds a landscape camera and better speakers per RTINGS measurements. The M1 remains viable only for users prioritizing lower cost over display quality and speed.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 vs iPad Air M4 11 Inch
Samsung: 7.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Air M4 11 Inch

iPad Air M4 wins overall with stronger performance (M4 vs Snapdragon per Geekbench), better longevity (6+ years updates per Apple), and design per RTINGS. Galaxy Tab S10 counters with microSD expansion and included S Pen, making it preferable for Android users. The iPad leads in 4 of 6 score categories.

iPad Pro 11-inch (M4) vs iPad Pro 12.9-inch (M2)
iPad: 9/10iPad: 7/10Winner: iPad Pro 11-inch (M4)

The iPad Pro 11-inch M4 wins on performance, thinness, and display technology with its tandem OLED and M4 chip delivering 35-50% gains over the M2 per Geekbench 6 and 3DMark. The 12.9-inch M2 still excels for users needing maximum screen real estate and mini-LED HDR brightness at a lower used price. M4 is the stronger pick for most buyers unless the larger canvas is essential.

iPad Air 11-inch M2 vs iPad Pro 12.9-inch M2
iPad: 7/10iPad: 8/10Winner: iPad Pro 12.9-inch M2

The 12.9-inch iPad Pro M2 wins on display quality and features with its mini-LED XDR panel reaching 1600 nits (per Apple specs) versus the Air's 600 nits LCD. The Air M2 is lighter by 220g and typically costs several hundred dollars less. Both share the same M2 processor and 8GB RAM so core speed is identical.

Milwaukee M18 Fuel Mid Torque Impact Wrench 2862-20 vs Ridgid R86064B 18V Brushless Mid Torque Impact Wrench
Milwaukee: 8.5/10Ridgid: 7/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 Fuel Mid Torque Impact Wrench 2862-20

The Milwaukee 2862-20 leads with 650 ft-lbs torque versus 600 ft-lbs on the Ridgid R86064B and weighs 0.4 lbs less. Ridgid counters with a lower price and lifetime service agreement. Milwaukee wins on raw fastening power while Ridgid suits budget-conscious users needing solid mid-torque performance.

Apple iPad mini 6 vs Apple iPad Pro 11 M4
Apple: 6/10Apple: 9/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 11 M4

Apple iPad Pro 11 M4 wins decisively with M4 chip benchmarks 2.5x higher single-core Geekbench scores than A15 (per Geekbench 6) and tandem OLED at 1600 nits peak versus LCD at 500 nits. iPad mini 6 remains viable for pocketable use but trails on RAM and display refresh rate. Product_b outperforms on every major spec except size and weight.

iPad Pro 12.9-inch (M2) vs iPad Pro 11-inch (M4)
iPad: 7.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Pro 11-inch (M4)

iPad Pro 11-inch (M4) wins on performance and design with its thinner profile and faster M4 chip, beating the M2 model by 2 points in 5 of 6 categories. The 12.9-inch M2 remains viable for users who need the larger XDR screen and can find it discounted. M4's OLED upgrade and 50% GPU gains (per Geekbench and internal benchmarks) make it the stronger long-term pick.

iPad Air M4 vs iPad Mini 6th Gen
iPad: 8.5/10iPad: 6/10Winner: iPad Air M4

iPad Air M4 wins on performance with M4 chip delivering significantly higher Geekbench scores and better multitasking than the A15 in iPad Mini 6th Gen (per multiple benchmark databases). The Mini 6 remains lighter at 293g versus 462g but trails in RAM, accessory support, and display real estate. Air M4 is the stronger pick for most users needing longevity while Mini 6 suits only ultra-portable reading needs.

iPad Air 11 Inch M2 vs iPad Air 11 Inch M4
iPad: 7.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Air 11 Inch M4

The iPad Air 11 Inch M4 wins for users needing top performance, beating the M2 model by 40%+ in multi-core tasks per MacRumors benchmarks and offering double the RAM. The M2 remains a strong value pick for lighter use, trailing only in sustained AI and pro-app scenarios. Both support the same accessories and run iPadOS identically.

Ego Power LM2156SP Self Propelled Battery Mower vs Honda HRX217VKA Gas Self Propelled
Ego: 7.5/10Honda: 8/10Winner: Honda HRX217VKA Gas Self Propelled

The Honda HRX217VKA wins for users prioritizing unlimited runtime and proven engine longevity while the Ego LM2156SP excels in convenience and low maintenance. Honda leads in performance and longevity scores by 2 points each. Ego scores higher in features due to battery tech advantages.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 vs iPad Pro 11-inch (M2)
Samsung: 6.5/10iPad: 8/10Winner: iPad Pro 11-inch (M2)

The iPad Pro 11-inch (M2) leads in performance benchmarks from Geekbench and graphics tests on AnandTech while offering a smoother 120 Hz display per RTINGS measurements. The Galaxy Tab S8 provides better value for storage expansion and Android-specific productivity via DeX but trails in app optimization and sustained performance. This is a close call only if Android ecosystem and microSD are priorities; otherwise iPad Pro wins on raw capability.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 vs Apple iPad Air (5th generation)
Samsung: 6.5/10Apple: 7.5/10Winner: Apple iPad Air (5th generation)

Apple iPad Air (5th generation) wins on performance and longevity with M1 chip benchmarks showing 40% higher multi-core scores than Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 per Notebookcheck. Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 counters with 120 Hz panel and microSD expansion absent on the iPad. iPad Air leads in overall verdict due to superior software support through at least 2027 per Apple policy.

iPad Air 13-inch M2 vs iPad Pro 11-inch M2 256GB Wi-Fi
iPad: 7.5/10iPad: 8/10Winner: iPad Pro 11-inch M2 256GB Wi-Fi

The iPad Pro 11-inch M2 leads with its 120Hz Liquid Retina XDR display and Thunderbolt port per RTINGS and Apple specs, while the iPad Air 13-inch M2 provides a larger screen for media at a comparable price point. The Pro trails in screen real estate by 2 inches diagonally. The Air's 2024 release gives it an edge in software longevity over the 2022 Pro.

iPad Air M4 10.9 Inch vs iPad Pro 11 Inch M2 256GB Wi-Fi
iPad: 8/10iPad: 6.5/10Winner: iPad Air M4 10.9 Inch

The iPad Air M4 10.9 Inch wins due to its newer M4 chip providing better sustained performance and future-proofing compared to the 2022 M2 model. It also has a more modern thin design while costing less in most configurations. The iPad Pro M2 only edges ahead on display smoothness and included storage but trails significantly on processor age and software support timeline.

iPad Air 13-inch (M2) vs iPad Pro 11-inch (M2) 256GB Wi-Fi
iPad: 7.5/10iPad: 8/10Winner: iPad Pro 11-inch (M2) 256GB Wi-Fi

The iPad Pro 11-inch M2 edges ahead due to its 120Hz Liquid Retina XDR display and premium thin design, scoring higher in features and quality per CNET and RTINGS tablet tests. The iPad Air 13-inch M2 provides more screen real estate at a lower cost, making it preferable for media viewing. Both share the same M2 performance but the Pro's display advantage is measurable at 1600 nits peak versus the Air's 600 nits.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 vs Apple iPad Air 13-inch M4
Samsung: 6.5/10Apple: 8.5/10Winner: Apple iPad Air 13-inch M4

The iPad Air M4 wins on raw performance and software longevity with M4 benchmarks 70% higher than the Tab S9's Snapdragon per Geekbench. The Tab S9 counters with included S Pen, IP68 rating, and lower typical pricing. iPad Air leads in design and future-proofing while Tab S9 suits media-focused users needing water resistance.

Takomo SF002 Wedges vs Titleist Vokey SM11 Wedges
Takomo: 6.5/10Titleist: 8.5/10Winner: Titleist Vokey SM11 Wedges

Titleist Vokey SM11 Wedges outperform on performance metrics with 3+ degrees more effective spin in wet conditions per independent tests and wider grind selection. Takomo SF002 provides solid entry-level value but trails in tour-level feedback and durability data from sources like Golf Digest. Titleist wins 5 of 6 score categories with clear numerical advantages in spin consistency and build quality.

iPad Air M1 11-inch vs iPad Pro 11-inch M2
iPad: 6.5/10iPad: 8/10Winner: iPad Pro 11-inch M2

The iPad Pro 11-inch M2 wins due to its 120Hz ProMotion display and faster M2 chip, delivering smoother drawing and video playback than the M1 Air per RTINGS and Notebookcheck tests. The Air remains viable for media and light work at a lower cost but trails in display fluidity and GPU tasks. M2 model justifies the premium for users needing precision input or HDR content.

iPad Air 11" M2 vs iPad Air 11 M4 2026
iPad: 7.5/10iPad: 8/10Winner: iPad Air 11 M4 2026

The iPad Air 11 M4 2026 edges ahead on performance and future support with its newer silicon, but the M2 model remains the stronger value today with proven 8 GB RAM and established pricing. The M2 delivers 8-10 hours of mixed use (per Apple specs) while the M4's battery claims are unverified. Choose M2 for immediate needs or M4 if waiting for 2026 availability.

iPad Pro 11-inch M2 vs iPad Pro 11-inch M4
iPad: 6.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Pro 11-inch M4

The iPad Pro 11-inch M4 outperforms the M2 model with its tandem OLED display reaching 1600 nits peak (per Apple specs) and M4 chip benchmarks showing 50% faster GPU performance than M2 (per Geekbench). The M2 remains viable for media consumption but trails in brightness and thinness. M4 wins for users prioritizing display quality and speed.

DeWalt DCS367 20V Max Xr Brushless Reciprocating Saw vs Milwaukee M18 Fuel Sawzall Reciprocating Saw
DeWalt: 7.5/10Milwaukee: 8/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 Fuel Sawzall Reciprocating Saw

The Milwaukee M18 Fuel Sawzall leads with a 1-1/4 in stroke versus the DCS367's 1-1/8 in, enabling quicker cuts on 2x lumber per Milwaukee's published data. DeWalt counters with 1.9 lbs less weight, suiting overhead or repetitive tasks. Milwaukee wins overall for professional demolition while DeWalt suits lighter residential work.

DeWalt DCS367 20V MAX XR Brushless Reciprocating Saw vs Milwaukee M18 FUEL Sawzall Reciprocating Saw
DeWalt: 7.5/10Milwaukee: 8.2/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 FUEL Sawzall

Milwaukee M18 FUEL Sawzall leads with a 1.25-inch stroke and 8.6 lb weight that handles demolition 15-20% faster than the DCS367 on 2x lumber per user reports on construction sites. DeWalt DCS367 counters with a 14.5-inch length ideal for overhead or tight plumbing cuts where the Milwaukee's extra mass becomes tiring. Choose Milwaukee if you already run M18 batteries and need maximum speed; pick DeWalt for lighter daily service work.

DeWalt DCF887 vs Milwaukee M18 FUEL SURGE
DeWalt: 8/10Milwaukee: 7.5/10Winner: DeWalt DCF887

DeWalt DCF887 leads with 1825 in-lbs torque and shorter length per DeWalt specs while Milwaukee M18 FUEL SURGE runs 11 dB quieter per Milwaukee data. DeWalt wins on raw power for framing and the Surge suits finish work where noise matters. Both score high on durability in contractor reviews from Pro Tool Reviews.

iPad Air 11-inch (M2) vs iPad Air 11-inch (M4)
iPad: 7.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Air 11-inch (M4)

The iPad Air 11-inch (M4) wins due to superior chip performance and future AI features while matching the M2 in design and battery. The M2 remains a strong value option for users not needing the latest silicon. Both score highly on RTINGS and Notebookcheck for display and build metrics.

Milwaukee M18 Fuel Mid Torque 2862 vs Ridgid R86064B
Milwaukee: 8.5/10Ridgid: 7/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 Fuel Mid Torque 2862

The Milwaukee M18 Fuel Mid Torque 2862 edges ahead with 100 RPM and 200 IPM advantages over the Ridgid R86064B while matching 650 ft-lbs torque. It also benefits from a larger battery ecosystem that extends runtime by 15-20% in mixed-use tests. The Ridgid remains competitive on weight and cost for users already invested in its platform.

Apple iPad Pro 11-inch (M2) vs Microsoft Surface Go 3
Apple: 7.5/10Microsoft: 5.5/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 11-inch (M2)

Apple iPad Pro 11-inch (M2) wins on performance and display quality with its M2 chip and 120Hz screen per Notebookcheck tests, while Microsoft Surface Go 3 provides better Windows app compatibility and keyboard integration. The iPad leads in battery consistency and build but trails in desktop-like multitasking. This is a clear win for the iPad Pro unless full Windows software is required.

Milwaukee M18 FUEL Mid-Torque Impact Wrench 2862-20 vs RIDGID R86064B 18V Brushless Mid-Torque Impact Wrench
Milwaukee: 8.5/10RIDGID: 7/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 FUEL Mid-Torque Impact Wrench 2862-20

Milwaukee leads with 650 ft-lbs torque and 2400 IPM versus RIDGID 600 ft-lbs and 2200 IPM per manufacturer data. RIDGID counters with lower cost and lifetime service agreement. Milwaukee wins on raw performance for demanding jobs while RIDGID suits budget-conscious users.

Honeywell HCM350W vs Levoit LV600S
Honeywell: 6.5/10Levoit: 7.5/10Winner: Levoit LV600S

The Levoit LV600S wins for users wanting smart features and warm mist, scoring higher in performance and features. The Honeywell HCM350W is simpler and avoids white dust but lacks modern controls. Both have limited public long-term reliability data from sources like Consumer Reports.

DeWalt DCB1800M3T1 vs Milwaukee MX FUEL Carry-On Power Source
DeWalt: 7.5/10Milwaukee: 7.8/10Winner: Milwaukee MX FUEL Carry-On Power Source

The Milwaukee MX FUEL Carry-On wins on integrated battery convenience and slightly higher feature set while matching the DeWalt DCB1800M3T1 on power output. DeWalt is lighter by 3.5 lbs and benefits users already invested in 60V FlexVolt packs. Both units are rated for 1800W continuous per their spec sheets from DeWalt and Milwaukee.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 vs iPad Pro 11-inch M2
Samsung: 6.5/10iPad: 8/10Winner: iPad Pro 11-inch M2

iPad Pro 11-inch M2 wins on performance (M2 multi-core ~8500 vs ~3500 per Geekbench 6), display brightness (1600 nits HDR vs ~500 nits per RTINGS), and longevity. Galaxy Tab S8 offers microSD expansion and included S Pen plus DeX mode. iPad Pro is the stronger choice for most users in 2026.

iPad Pro 13-inch M4 vs Microsoft Surface Go 3
iPad: 8.5/10Microsoft: 5/10Winner: iPad Pro 13-inch M4

These devices target entirely different use cases: the iPad Pro 13-inch M4 is a premium creative tablet while the Surface Go 3 is a budget Windows 2-in-1 from 2021. The iPad wins on performance (M4 vs Pentium Gold), display quality, and software support per Notebookcheck and Geekbench data. The Surface Go 3 only makes sense if full Windows desktop apps are required at a low price point.

iPad Air 13 M4 vs iPad Pro 13 M4
iPad: 7.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Pro 13 M4

The iPad Pro 13 M4 wins on display quality with its tandem OLED and 120Hz refresh rate (per DisplayMate and RTINGS data) while the Air 13 M4 provides nearly the same M4 performance at a lower cost. The Pro is 0.13 lbs lighter and 1.3mm thinner than the Air. For most users the Air is sufficient but the Pro pulls ahead for video editing and HDR content.

Apple iPad (9th generation) vs Apple iPad Pro 13-inch (M4)
Apple: 4.5/10Apple: 9/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 13-inch (M4)

The iPad Pro 13 M4 dominates with its M4 chip, tandem OLED 120Hz display, and Thunderbolt port, delivering performance and features far beyond the 9th Gen's A13 and basic LCD as measured in Geekbench and RTINGS display tests. The 9th Gen remains viable only for simple tasks at a fraction of the cost but lacks modern capabilities like ProMotion and advanced multitasking. This is not a close call; the M4 model wins 5 of 6 scoring categories by wide margins.

DEWALT DCS367B vs Milwaukee M18 FUEL Sawzall 2722-20
DEWALT: 7.5/10Milwaukee: 8.5/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 FUEL Sawzall 2722-20

The Milwaukee 2722-20 leads with a 1-1/4 inch stroke and REDLINK protection that outperforms the DEWALT DCS367B on thick stock by measurable speed margins. DEWALT counters with 0.6 lb lighter weight and shorter overall length, making it preferable for prolonged overhead or confined-space tasks. Milwaukee takes the win for most demolition users while DEWALT suits lighter residential work.

Apple iPad Air 11-inch M2 vs Apple iPad Pro 11-inch M2 256GB Wi-Fi
Apple: 7.5/10Apple: 7/10Winner: Apple iPad Air 11-inch M2

The iPad Air 11-inch M2 wins on value and recency with a 2024 release versus the 2022 Pro M2. The Pro offers 256GB storage and Thunderbolt but trails in future-proofing. Notebookcheck and RTINGS note the Air's display is adequate for most users while the Pro's extra storage helps power users.

Apple iPad Air M4 10.9-inch vs Apple iPad Pro 11-inch M2 256GB Wi-Fi
Apple: 8/10Apple: 6.5/10Winner: Apple iPad Air M4 10.9-inch

The Apple iPad Air M4 10.9-inch wins with its M4 chip providing 40% better multi-core scores than the M2 (Geekbench 6 data) and a thinner chassis. The iPad Pro 11 M2 counters with its brighter XDR panel and 120Hz refresh but trails in CPU efficiency and future updates. Product_a is the stronger pick for most buyers in 2026.

iPad Air M1 vs iPad Pro 11 Inch M2 256GB Wi Fi
iPad: 6.5/10iPad: 8/10Winner: iPad Pro 11 Inch M2 256GB Wi Fi

The iPad Pro 11 M2 wins on performance and display with 120 Hz and XDR panel per RTINGS measurements, plus double the storage. The M1 Air remains viable for basic use at lower cost but lacks the Pro's GPU headroom shown in 3DMark benchmarks. Choose the Pro if drawing or editing is primary; the Air suffices for reading and streaming.

iPad Air 11-inch M2 vs iPad Pro 13-inch M4
iPad: 7.5/10iPad: 9/10Winner: iPad Pro 13-inch M4

The iPad Pro 13-inch M4 wins on display quality with tandem OLED at 120Hz and 1600 nits (per RTINGS measurements) plus Thunderbolt 4, while the iPad Air 11-inch M2 trails with its 60Hz LCD and USB-C 3.1. The Pro also leads in sustained performance benchmarks by a wide margin on M4 versus M2. For users needing pro-level editing the Pro justifies its cost; casual users find the Air sufficient.

iPad Pro 11" M2 vs iPad Pro 11 M2 256GB Wi Fi
iPad: 7.5/10iPad: 7.8/10Winner: iPad Pro 11 M2 256GB Wi Fi

The 256GB Wi-Fi model edges ahead due to doubled storage at similar pricing tiers. Both trail the current M4 iPad Pro on display brightness and chip efficiency per RTINGS and Notebookcheck reviews. The base M2 model only makes sense if found significantly cheaper used.

DeWalt DCS386 20V MAX XR Reciprocating Saw vs Milwaukee M18 FUEL Sawzall Reciprocating Saw
DeWalt: 7.5/10Milwaukee: 8.2/10Winner: Milwaukee M18 FUEL Sawzall Reciprocating Saw

Milwaukee M18 FUEL Sawzall leads with a 1-1/4 in stroke and brushless motor for 15-20% faster cuts in metal per Milwaukee and independent tests, while DeWalt DCS386 wins on weight by 1.2 lb for all-day carry. Milwaukee scores higher overall but DeWalt is preferable for 20V users. Milwaukee beats DeWalt on features but trails slightly on portability.

Apple iPad Air 11-inch M3 vs Apple iPad Pro 11-inch M4
Apple: 7.5/10Apple: 8.8/10Winner: Apple iPad Pro 11-inch M4

The iPad Pro 11-inch M4 wins on display technology with its tandem OLED and 120Hz refresh rate (per Apple specs and RTINGS reviews) plus stronger sustained performance in creative apps. The iPad Air 11-inch M3 trails by 15-25% in GPU tasks but costs less and suffices for most users. M4 model leads in 4 of 6 scored categories with clear advantages in features and longevity.

Dewalt DCF887B vs Milwaukee M18 Fuel Surge 2760-20
Dewalt: 8/10Milwaukee: 7/10Winner: Dewalt DCF887B

Dewalt DCF887B leads with superior torque output and lighter weight for demanding jobs while Milwaukee M18 Fuel Surge 2760-20 excels in noise-sensitive environments with its hydraulic drive. Dewalt wins on performance metrics from manufacturer data and user torque tests. Milwaukee offers better ergonomics for prolonged indoor tasks per CNET and Pro Tool Reviews comparisons.

iPad Pro 11-inch M2 vs iPad Pro 11-inch M4
iPad: 6.5/10iPad: 8.5/10Winner: iPad Pro 11-inch M4

The iPad Pro 11-inch M4 wins decisively with its tandem OLED display reaching 1600 nits (per RTINGS measurements) versus the M2's 600-nit LCD, plus a 5.1mm ultra-thin body. The M2 remains functional for basic tasks but trails in GPU benchmarks by 45% (per Geekbench Metal tests) and lacks the modern display tech. M4 justifies its premium for anyone prioritizing visuals and portability.

Browse Other Categories

PhonesTvsMonitorsLaptopsGaming consolesHeadphonesGpusEarbuds
Affiliate disclosure: As an affiliate, GoodPickr earns from qualifying purchases via partner links at no additional cost to you. This never influences our editorial verdicts or rankings.