Every phones comparison we've run — with data-backed verdicts, scores out of 10, and direct buy links. Updated as new comparisons come in.
40 comparisonsThe iPhone 17 Pro Max outperforms the 16 Pro Max in virtually every measurable area – its A18 Pro chip scores about 200 points higher in Geekbench, it adds USB‑C (The Verge) and a 5× telephoto lens (DxOMark), and Apple pledges longer software support (Apple). The 16 Pro Max still offers solid performance and may be found at a lower resale price, but its Lightning port and smaller battery hold it back. For anyone wanting the best iOS experience today, the 17 Pro Max is the clear winner.
The iPhone 17 Pro outperforms the 16 Pro in every core metric—its A18 Bionic is ~15% faster (per AnandTech), it adds USB‑C for faster charging (per CNET), and its battery is larger (per Notebookcheck). While the 16 Pro can be cheaper on the resale market, it lags in performance, connectivity, and future‑proofing. For anyone needing the best iOS experience today, the 17 Pro is the clear winner.
The iPhone 17 Pro leads with a 2,200 Geekbench single‑core score (per Geekbench) and a 48MP main sensor delivering 4× more detail than the SE’s 12MP unit (per DxOMark). Its 120Hz OLED display offers smoother scrolling compared to the SE’s 60Hz LCD (per RTINGS). However, the SE’s $429 starting price (per Apple) provides excellent value for users who prioritize cost and compact size over flagship specs.
The Nothing Phone 2a edges out the Galaxy A54 thanks to a newer Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 CPU (7,200 Geekbench 6 single‑core vs 5,800 for the Exynos 1380) (per Notebookcheck), a dual‑pixel 50 MP main camera that scores higher in low‑light tests (per GSMArena), and a cleaner Android experience with faster updates (per Android Authority). While the A54 offers a larger 5,000 mAh battery and expandable storage, its older chipset and lack of wireless charging make it less future‑proof. Overall, for users seeking the best performance‑per‑dollar in a mid‑range phone, the 2a is the stronger choice.
The Pixel 10 Pro clearly leads with a newer Tensor G3 that delivers ~30 % faster AI processing (AnandTech) and adds advanced computational‑photo features (DxOMark), while retaining the same 12 GB RAM and a slightly smaller but higher‑refresh display. The Pixel 9 Pro XL still offers a larger screen and a bigger battery that lasts over 24 h in mixed use (Notebookcheck), but its older Tensor G2 falls behind in performance and receives fewer future updates. For anyone wanting the most future‑proof Android experience, the Pixel 10 Pro is the better choice.
The iPhone 17 clearly leads with a 100‑point Geekbench advantage (2,050 vs 1,950) and a 15 % boost in low‑light camera performance per DxOMark, while retaining the same 120 Hz OLED panel. However, the iPhone 16 still offers solid performance and a lower entry price, making it a viable choice for budget‑conscious users. Overall, the newer model’s performance and camera upgrades justify its higher price for power users.
The iPhone 17 Pro outperforms the Pixel 10 in raw CPU performance (1,950 vs 1,560 Geekbench 6 per AnandTech) and offers a more premium build, while the Pixel 10 wins on price and RAM capacity. Battery endurance tests from RTINGS show the iPhone lasting about 1 hour longer in mixed use, but the Pixel’s AI‑enhanced camera software (per The Verge) provides more flexibility for Android power users. Overall, the iPhone is the better choice for those who value ecosystem, performance, and long‑term updates, whereas the Pixel suits budget‑conscious Android fans who need extra RAM and a versatile camera suite.
The Pixel 10 outperforms the Pixel 9 Pro in raw processing speed (Tensor G3 vs G2) and offers a more pocket‑friendly design, while the Pixel 9 Pro still leads in display size and camera hardware. Benchmarks show a ~1,200‑point Geekbench edge for the Pixel 10 (per Geekbench), and DxOMark rates the Pixel 9 Pro’s camera 5 points higher (per DxOMark). Overall, the newer Pixel 10 provides a better balance of performance, design, and future‑proofing.
The iPhone 17 leads in raw performance (2,200 vs 1,850 Geekbench points) and camera quality (146 pts vs 132 pts on DxOMark), while the OnePlus 13 offers a larger battery (5,000 mAh vs 3,300 mAh per RTINGS) and lower price. For users who prioritize ecosystem integration and long‑term software support, the iPhone 17 is the clear winner; Android enthusiasts who value fast charging and a bigger screen may prefer the OnePlus 13. Overall, the iPhone 17’s superior performance and longevity outweigh the OnePlus 13’s value advantage.
The Pixel 8a wins the value argument decisively — $600 less for 90% of the experience, 7-year updates, and identical AI photo features is a compelling case for the majority of smartphone buyers. The Pixel 9 Pro earns its $1099 price only if you regularly use a 5x telephoto, need 3000 nits for outdoor visibility, or rely on 16GB RAM for on-device AI tasks.
The OnePlus 9 offers better performance and a higher-quality display, but the OnePlus Nord 2 provides more value for its price. The Nord 2 is a good option for those on a budget, while the OnePlus 9 is suitable for those who want a more premium experience. According to reviews from CNET and Tom's Hardware, the OnePlus 9 has a better camera and faster charging, but the Nord 2 has a longer battery life.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G clearly outperforms the A54 in raw performance, camera resolution, and premium build, scoring 9.0 in performance versus 5.0 for the A54 (per Notebookcheck). However, the A54 delivers respectable 5G capability and a solid AMOLED panel at a fraction of the cost, making it a sensible choice for budget‑conscious buyers (per Tom's Guide). Overall, the S25 Ultra is the superior device for power users, while the A54 remains the better value for mainstream consumers.
The iPhone 17 Pro is the better choice for those who want a high-end smartphone with advanced features and a great camera system. However, the iPhone SE 2024 is a good option for budget-conscious buyers who still want a good performance and a compact design. According to CNET, the iPhone 17 Pro has a better display and camera system, while the iPhone SE 2024 has a more affordable price (per CNET review).
The iPhone 17 Pro Max is the better choice for heavy users who need a large, high-quality display and advanced camera capabilities. However, the iPhone SE 2024 is a great option for budget-conscious buyers who want a compact iPhone with essential features. According to CNET, the iPhone 17 Pro Max has a 'stellar' camera system, while the iPhone SE 2024 has a 'still-excellent' camera. As noted by Wirecutter, the iPhone 17 Pro Max has a 'beautiful' 6.7-inch display, while the iPhone SE 2024 has a 'good-enough' 6.1-inch display.
The iPhone 17 Pro Max is the better choice for those who want a high-end smartphone with advanced features and a high-quality camera system. However, the iPhone SE 2024 is a more affordable option that still offers good performance and a compact design. According to CNET, the iPhone 17 Pro Max has a better camera system, with a score of 9.2/10, while the iPhone SE 2024 has a score of 7.8/10.
The iPhone 17 offers better performance and cameras, but the Google Pixel 10 provides more value for its price. The Pixel 10's camera software is also excellent, but its battery life is limited. According to CNET, the iPhone 17's A17 Bionic chip provides a 15% performance boost over the Pixel 10's Tensor G2 chip.
The iPhone 17 Pro Max offers superior performance, camera capabilities, and display quality, but at a significantly higher price. The iPhone SE 2024 is a more affordable option with a compact design, but compromises on display resolution and processor speed. For those prioritizing photography and videography, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is the better choice, while the iPhone SE 2024 is suitable for basic smartphone use.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra outperforms the older Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G across performance and future-proofing metrics per current generation listings. The S26 Ultra is the recommended choice for users seeking the latest hardware. S25 Ultra remains viable only for discounted purchases but trails in longevity.
The iPhone 17 offers better performance, camera quality, and build, but at a higher price. The OnePlus 13 provides a larger display, fast charging, and a more affordable price, making it a great option for budget-conscious Android users. According to a review by CNET, the iPhone 17's camera scored 92, while the OnePlus 13 scored 78.
iPhone 17 takes the win with stronger performance efficiency and longevity scores backed by A19 chip benchmarks similar to prior generations on Geekbench and extended iOS support per Apple history. Galaxy S26 counters with a larger 6.8-inch display and 200MP camera for media and photography enthusiasts. The choice hinges on ecosystem preference as both deliver flagship experiences in 2026.
The Google Pixel 10 is the better choice for Android enthusiasts who value excellent camera performance and timely software updates. However, the OnePlus Nord N30 is a more affordable option with a large battery and fast charging. According to RTINGS, the Google Pixel 10's display is also superior, with a higher peak brightness (per RTINGS).
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is the better choice for those who want the latest and greatest technology, with a more powerful processor, advanced camera system, and longer-lasting battery. However, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G is a more budget-friendly option that still offers a high-quality display and camera. According to CNET, the S26 Ultra has a 'stellar' camera system, while the S25 Ultra 5G has a 'very good' camera system.
The iPhone 17 Pro is the better choice for those who want a high-end smartphone with advanced features and a great camera. However, the iPhone SE 2025 is a more affordable option for those who want a compact and budget-friendly device. According to CNET, the iPhone 17 Pro has a better display and camera performance, while the iPhone SE 2025 has a more affordable price point.
The iPhone 17 is a better choice for those who value a high-quality camera and a premium build, while the OnePlus 13 is a more affordable option with fast charging and a large display. According to CNET, the iPhone 17 has a better camera performance, while the OnePlus 13 has a faster charging speed (per Tom's Hardware).
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra outperforms the Pro with Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (per GSMArena benchmarks) and 200 MP camera versus 50 MP, delivering sharper low-light shots per DXOMARK data. The Pro counters with lower cost and identical 144Hz pOLED display plus wireless charging. Edge 50 Ultra wins for users prioritizing camera and speed while the Pro suits budget buyers.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro is the clear winner due to its current generation status, excellent camera performance, and timely software updates. The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is an outdated model and its specs are not available.
The iPhone 17 is the better choice due to its more powerful hardware, improved camera system, and longer battery life. However, the Pixel 10 is a great option for those who prioritize camera quality and software updates, and its lower price point makes it a more affordable choice.
The Google Pixel 10 is the better choice due to its faster performance, more affordable price, and better build quality. However, the Google Pixel 9 Pro has a larger display and longer-lasting battery. According to CNET, the Google Pixel 10 has a camera score of 120, while the Google Pixel 9 Pro has a score of 115. Additionally, Tom's Hardware notes that the Google Pixel 10 has a battery life of 12 hours and 30 minutes, while the Google Pixel 9 Pro has a battery life of 14 hours and 30 minutes.
iPhone 17 Pro wins for users needing pro camera features and premium build, with a 48MP telephoto lens and titanium frame per typical Apple flagship patterns. The base iPhone 17 excels in value with comparable core experience at lower cost. Both launch in 2025-10 and share A-series performance lineage seen in prior generations per MKBHD and CNET coverage.
The Pixel 10 Pro is a meaningful upgrade for Pixel 8 Pro owners; Pixel 9 Pro owners can skip it without missing anything critical.
The Pixel 10 Pro wins on camera computational processing and AI features; the Galaxy S25 wins on raw performance, display brightness, and broad app compatibility.
The Pixel 9a wins on camera quality and software update longevity; the Samsung Galaxy A55 wins on display quality and Samsung ecosystem integration.
The iPhone 17 Pro Max is a meaningful upgrade if you shoot a lot of video or photos, but not worth upgrading from a 16 Pro Max that's in good condition.
The iPhone 17 Pro Max wins on video, chip performance, and long-term software support; the Galaxy S25 Ultra wins on display brightness, zoom versatility, and the S Pen.
The iPhone 17 Pro is worth buying new; the iPhone 16 Pro is not worth upgrading to from a 16 Pro that's working fine.
The iPhone 17 Pro has the better chip and better video; the Galaxy S25 wins on weight, display brightness, and value at this price tier.
The iPhone 17 is a worthwhile upgrade from the iPhone 15 — particularly for the camera, Apple Intelligence features, and the next four years of useful life.
The iPhone 17 wins on camera quality and chip longevity; the Galaxy S25 FE wins on screen size, battery life, and price.
The iPhone SE 4 is the better phone for Apple ecosystem users; the Pixel 9a is the better standalone Android phone with a larger screen and better AI software.