Hoka Clifton 9 vs On Cloudsurfer 2
Hoka Clifton 9 wins — Hoka Clifton 9 wins for more runners: better fit range, Meta-Rocker geometry for heel strikers, and max cushion protecti…
Scores: Hoka Clifton 9 9/10 · On Cloudsurfer 2 8/10
Hoka Clifton 9 wins for more runners: better fit range, Meta-Rocker geometry for heel strikers, and max cushion protection make it the safer daily trainer choice. On Cloudsurfer 2 wins for narrow-footed neutral runners who want a livelier, lighter ride and care about cold-weather foam performance. Know your foot width and strike pattern before choosing.
Hoka Clifton 9 lists at $145 while On Cloudsurfer 2 lists at $149 — Hoka Clifton 9 undercuts On Cloudsurfer 2 by $4 (3%).
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Hoka Clifton 9 | On Cloudsurfer 2 |
|---|
| stack_height | 29mm heel / 24mm forefoot (5mm drop) | 30mm heel / 22mm forefoot (8mm drop) |
|---|
| midsole | CMEVA compression-molded foam | CloudTec Phase foam, helion superfoam |
|---|
| upper | Engineered mesh, flat-knit | Engineered mesh, precision mesh construction |
|---|
| weight | 248g (US 9 men) | 225g (US 9 men) |
|---|
| outsole | Durable rubber coverage, Meta-Rocker geometry | CloudTec rubber pods |
|---|
| widths | Regular, Wide, X-Wide | Regular only (most models) |
|---|
Hoka Clifton 9
What works
- Meta-Rocker curved geometry shifts gait forward passively — reduces calf and ankle strain for heel strikers
- 29mm heel stack absorbs impact without feeling mushy — significant protection for high-mileage training weeks
- Available in regular, wide, and X-wide — the widest fit range of any major running brand
What doesn't
- CMEVA foam compresses under repetitive load — replaces at ~400-500 miles for full cushion protection
- Heavy at 248g vs On Cloudsurfer's 225g — the 23g difference is noticeable in a pace comparison
- Doesn't reward efficient midfoot strikers as much as firmer shoes — designed for heel-strike correction
On Cloudsurfer 2
What works
- CloudTec Phase pods provide a firm-then-cushioned landing that trained runners describe as more energetic than HOKA
- 225g is 23g lighter than Clifton 9 — noticeable over 10 miles in tempo work
- Helion superfoam retains its bounce properties better than CMEVA in cold weather (below 40°F)
What doesn't
- Regular width only for most models — not suitable for runners with wide feet
- CloudTec pod design creates a narrow contact footprint that reduces stability for overpronators
- $149 for a shoe that fits normal to narrow feet only — HOKA offers wider sizing for the same price
Bottom line
Our pick: Hoka Clifton 9.
Browse all comparisons | Trending