Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX vs Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX

Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX wins — Hoka Anacapa 2 wins for day hikers on well-maintained trails who want maximum cushioning on long descents

Scores: Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX 9/10 · Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX 8/10

Hoka Anacapa 2 wins for day hikers on well-maintained trails who want maximum cushioning on long descents. Salomon X Ultra 4 wins for technical terrain and backpacking where lighter weight and ground feel are more valuable than cushion stack height.

Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX lists at $180 while Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX lists at $160 — Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX undercuts Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX by $20 (13%).

Spec-by-spec comparison

Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTXSalomon X Ultra 4 GTX
midsoleCMEVA midsole, 28mm heel stack heightEnergyCell+ midsole, 18mm heel stack height
outsoleVibram Megagrip, 4mm lug depthContagrip MA, 4mm lug depth
waterproofGore-Tex Extended Comfort membraneGore-Tex waterproof membrane
weight384g per shoe (men's 9.5)346g per shoe (men's 9.5)
drop5mm heel-to-toe drop11mm heel-to-toe drop
terrainPacked trails, moderate technical terrainTechnical terrain, mixed surfaces, scrambling

Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX

What works

  • 28mm CMEVA stack height provides exceptional cushioning on descents — knee fatigue on long day hikes is measurably reduced
  • Vibram Megagrip outsole outperforms most brand-specific rubber compounds on wet roots and rock
  • Rocker geometry reduces forefoot fatigue on flat pack-out sections

What doesn't

  • High stack height reduces ankle proprioception — less feel for loose technical terrain
  • Wide platform is slower to drain standing water than low-profile competitors
  • Not ideal for scrambling or very technical rocky terrain where a lower profile excels

Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX

What works

  • Low 18mm stack gives superior ground feel — better for technical scrambling where foot placement precision matters
  • 346g is 38g lighter per shoe than Anacapa — noticeable on 20+ mile backpacking trips
  • 11mm drop works better with traditional hiking posture and pack weight on descents

What doesn't

  • Less cushioning on long sustained flat sections compared to Hoka's thicker midsole
  • Contagrip MA is good but trails slightly behind Vibram Megagrip on wet polished rock
  • $20 more than entry-level Salomon models for the same technical capability

Bottom line

Our pick: Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX. It edges out the alternative on 28mm cmeva stack height provides exceptional cushioning on descents — knee fatigue on long day hikes is measurably reduced. That said, Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX still wins on low 18mm stack gives superior ground feel — better for technical scrambling where foot placement precision matters — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.

Browse all comparisons | Trending