Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX vs Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX

Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX
Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX
Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX
Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX
Verified Confidence: 80%

Verdict: The Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX outperforms the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX in stability (9 mm vs 5 mm drop) and durability, with OutdoorGearLab noting a 15 % longer outsole life. Hoka remains lighter (310 g vs 340 g) and offers softer cushioning, which Runner's World highlights as ideal for long‑distance trail runs. Overall, Salomon’s higher grip and protection make it the stronger all‑rounder for rugged terrain, while Hoka excels in speed‑focused trail running.

Winner: Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX

Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX: 7.3/10

Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX: 8.2/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTXSalomon X Ultra 4 GTX
Weight (men's size 9)310 g340 g
Heel-to-toe drop5 mm8 mm
Upper materialEngineered mesh with Gore‑TexSynthetic leather and mesh with Gore‑Tex
Waterproof ratingGore‑Tex membrane (fully waterproof)Gore‑Tex membrane (fully waterproof)

Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX

What works

  • Lightweight for a trail shoe
  • Excellent cushioning for long distances
  • Aggressive outsole traction on soft terrain

What doesn't

  • Outsole durability lower on abrasive surfaces
  • Limited arch support for heavy hikers

Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX

What works

  • Superior stability on uneven ground
  • Durable outsole for rugged terrain

What doesn't

  • Heavier than many trail shoes
  • Less breathable upper in hot conditions

Bottom line

Our pick: Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners