Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX vs Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX

Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX
Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX
Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX
Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX
Verified Confidence: 80%

Verdict: Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX excels in plush cushioning for long hikes while Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX provides superior stability and lighter weight for technical terrain per RunRepeat and Runner's World comparisons. Salomon wins on performance metrics but Hoka leads in comfort for extended wear. The 0.9 oz weight difference and 6 mm drop variance create noticeable handling distinctions on varied trails.

Winner: Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX

Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX: 8/10

Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX: 7.5/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTXSalomon X Ultra 4 GTX
Weight13.4 oz12.3 oz
Drop5 mm11 mm
WaterproofingGore-TexGore-Tex
MidsoleCMEVA foamEnergyCell foam

Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX

What works

  • 13.4 oz per shoe keeps feet comfortable on long hikes
  • CMEVA foam provides high cushioning for rocky trails
  • Gore-Tex membrane maintains dryness in wet conditions

What doesn't

  • 5 mm drop may feel unstable on steep descents
  • CMEVA foam compresses faster after 300 miles

Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX

What works

  • 12.3 oz per shoe improves agility on technical terrain
  • 11 mm drop offers stable platform for steep slopes
  • Gore-Tex membrane maintains dryness in wet conditions

What doesn't

  • EnergyCell foam provides less plush cushioning than competitors
  • Narrower fit may require break-in for wide feet

Bottom line

Our pick: Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons