HOKA Clifton 9 vs Brooks Ghost 16

HOKA Clifton 9
HOKA Clifton 9
Brooks Ghost 16
Verified Confidence: 85%

Verdict: The HOKA Clifton 9 excels for runners seeking maximal cushioning and speed on daily miles, beating the Brooks Ghost 16 by 1.3 oz in weight and offering a lower 5 mm drop versus 12 mm per HOKA and Brooks official specs. The Brooks Ghost 16 provides superior longevity at over 400 miles compared to the Clifton 9's 300-mile limit according to Runner's World and Road Runner Sports reviews. Choose the Clifton 9 for plush recovery runs or the Ghost 16 for versatile training that holds up longer.

Winner: HOKA Clifton 9

HOKA Clifton 9: 8.5/10

Brooks Ghost 16: 8/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

HOKA Clifton 9Brooks Ghost 16
Weight (men's size 9)7.5 oz8.8 oz
Heel-to-toe drop5 mm12 mm
Cushioning typeCME-EVA foamDNA Loft v3
Upper materialEngineered meshEngineered mesh

HOKA Clifton 9

What works

  • Exceptionally lightweight for daily training
  • Plush underfoot cushioning reduces impact
  • Smooth rocker geometry aids forward propulsion

What doesn't

  • Durability limited to 250-300 miles
  • Narrower fit may require sizing up

Brooks Ghost 16

What works

  • Versatile for both easy and tempo runs
  • Reliable durability often exceeds 400 miles
  • Stable platform with smooth transitions

What doesn't

  • Heavier feel compared to minimalist options
  • Less maximal cushioning than HOKA models

Bottom line

Our pick: HOKA Clifton 9. It edges out the alternative on exceptionally lightweight for daily training. That said, Brooks Ghost 16 still wins on versatile for both easy and tempo runs — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons