Dr Martens 1460 Boot vs HOKA Clifton 9

Dr Martens 1460 Boot
HOKA Clifton 9
HOKA Clifton 9

Verdict: The Dr Martens 1460 weighs 1.2 kg (per Dr Martens official specs) and offers a timeless look, but its heft makes it unsuitable for running, whereas the HOKA Clifton 9 tips the scales at just 8.5 oz (per HOKA product page) and delivers a 30 mm stack height that Runner’s World rates as an 8.5/10 for cushioning. RunRepeat gives the Clifton 9 a 4.5‑star durability rating, while the boot scores 4‑stars for longevity on Nordstrom reviews. Overall, the Clifton 9 wins for performance‑oriented users, while the 1460 remains the better style‑focused, long‑lasting option.

Dr Martens 1460 Boot lists at $150 while HOKA Clifton 9 lists at $130 — HOKA Clifton 9 undercuts Dr Martens 1460 Boot by $20 (15%).

Winner: HOKA Clifton 9

Dr Martens 1460 Boot: 7/10

HOKA Clifton 9: 8/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Dr Martens 1460 BootHOKA Clifton 9
Upper Material100% leather—
Sole TypeAir-cushioned rubber—
Heel Height1.5 inches—
Weight1.2 kg8.5 oz (≈240 g)
Stack Height—30 mm
Drop—5 mm

Dr Martens 1460 Boot

What works

  • Iconic style that lasts decades
  • Durable leather upper
  • Air-cushioned sole reduces fatigue

What doesn't

  • Heavy for all‑day walking
  • Limited breathability

HOKA Clifton 9

What works

  • Ultra‑lightweight for fast runs
  • Responsive EVA midsole cushioning
  • Breathable mesh keeps feet cool

What doesn't

  • Less durable on rough terrain
  • Minimal arch support

Bottom line

Our pick: HOKA Clifton 9.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners