Canon EOS R6 vs Panasonic Lumix S5
Decision sheet: the facts that decide it
Canon EOS R6: 5 of 9 decision facts sourced. Missing: Stabilization, Burst, Autofocus, Viewfinder.
Panasonic Lumix S5: 5 of 9 decision facts sourced. Missing: Stabilization, Burst, Autofocus, Viewfinder.
| Canon EOS R6 | Panasonic Lumix S5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price today | Price not yet checked | Price not yet checked |
| Sensor | 35mm Full Frame (36 x 24 mm) bestbuy.com | 35mm Full Frame (36 x 24 mm) bestbuy.com |
| Resolution | 32.5 megapixels bestbuy.com | 24.2 megapixels bestbuy.com |
| Video | 7K bestbuy.com | 4K (2160p) bestbuy.com |
| Weight | 1.52 pounds bestbuy.com | 4.47 pounds bestbuy.com |
| Starting MSRP | $2,599.00 bestbuy.com | $1,799.99 bestbuy.com |
Not yet sourced — Canon EOS R6: Stabilization, Burst, Autofocus, Viewfinder. Panasonic Lumix S5: Stabilization, Burst, Autofocus, Viewfinder. No manufacturer, official or retailer source we read publishes these yet; we don't estimate them.
Pick Canon EOS R6 if
- More resolution — 32.5 MP vs 24.2 MP (bestbuy.com, bestbuy.com)
- Lighter — 1.52 lb vs 4.47 lb (bestbuy.com, bestbuy.com)
Pick Panasonic Lumix S5 if
- Lower starting price — $1,799 vs $2,599 (bestbuy.com, bestbuy.com)
Skip both if
- Neither publishes stabilization, burst, autofocus or viewfinder yet.
Verdict: The EOS R6 offers more resolution (32.5 MP vs 24.2 MP) and lighter (1.52 lb vs 4.47 lb); the Lumix S5 counters with lower starting price ($1,799 vs $2,599). Neither publishes stabilization, burst, autofocus or viewfinder yet.
Canon EOS R6 lists at $2,499 while Panasonic Lumix S5 lists at $1,999 — Panasonic Lumix S5 undercuts Canon EOS R6 by $500 (25%).
Our take: Battery life on both is comparable, but the R6’s grip feels a touch more substantial for handheld shooting.
Provisional pick: Canon EOS R6 — not enough sourced decision facts for Canon EOS R6 and Panasonic Lumix S5. We don't rank on specs we can't verify.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Canon EOS R6 | Panasonic Lumix S5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | 35mm Full Frame (36 x 24 mm) | 35mm Full Frame (36 x 24 mm) |
| Resolution | 32.5 megapixels | 24.2 megapixels |
| ISO range | 100 | — |
| Video | 7K | 4K (2160p) |
| Weight | 1.52 pounds | 4.47 pounds |
| Starting MSRP | $2,599.00 | $1,799.99 |
Canon EOS R6
What works
- Dual Pixel AF covers most of frame for reliable tracking
- Robust weather‑sealed body
What doesn't
- Battery life modest for long shoots
Panasonic Lumix S5
What works
- Higher‑resolution sensor for stills
- 10‑bit 4K video with V‑Log for color grading
- More affordable entry price
What doesn't
- Autofocus slower than Canon’s Dual Pixel system
- Lower continuous‑shoot speed
Bottom line
Provisional pick: Canon EOS R6 — not enough sourced decision facts for Canon EOS R6 and Panasonic Lumix S5.
View full comparison on GoodPickr
Related Comparisons
- Nikon Z6 II Mirrorless Camera vs Panasonic Lumix S5IIX Mirrorless Camera
- Sony Alpha 1 vs Canon EOS R5C
- Canon EOS R7 vs Sony Alpha 1
- Canon EOS R5 C vs Sony FX3
- Panasonic LUMIX S5IIX vs Sony Alpha 7 IV
- Canon EOS R1 vs Canon EOS R5
- Canon EOS R3 Mirrorless Camera Body Only vs Sony Alpha 1 II Mirrorless Camera Body Only
- Nikon Z6 II vs Panasonic GH6
- Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony A7 V
- Conair Pro 2000W Salon Performance Hair Dryer vs Panasonic EH-NA65V 2000W Hair Dryer
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-T4
- Canon EOS R6 vs Sony Alpha A6700
People also compared
- nikon z6 ii mirrorless camera vs panasonic lumix s5iix mirrorless camera Camera
- Panasonic LUMIX S5IIX vs Sony Alpha 7 IV mirrorless camera
- canon eos r6 mark ii vs sony a7 v Cameras
- Canon EOS R6 vs Sony Alpha A6700 Cameras
- Panasonic Lumix S5 II vs Ricoh GR IIIx Cameras
- Sony Alpha 1 Mark II vs Canon EOS R6 Mirrorless Camera
Buying guides · In-depth comparisons
View Interactive Comparison →Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.
GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners