Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Fujifilm X T4
Decision sheet: the facts that decide it
Canon EOS R5 Mark II: 7 of 9 decision facts sourced.
Fujifilm X-T4: 9 of 9 decision facts sourced.
| Canon EOS R5 Mark II | Fujifilm X-T4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price today | Price not yet checked | Price not yet checked |
| Sensor | 35mm Full Frame (36 x 24 mm) bestbuy.com | APS-C (23.6 x 15.7 mm) bestbuy.com |
| Resolution | 45 megapixels bestbuy.com | 26.1 megapixels bestbuy.com |
| Stabilization | Not yet sourced | Image sensor shift mechanism with 5-axis compensation fujifilm-x.com |
| Burst | Not yet sourced | Approx. 30fps fujifilm-x.com |
| Video | 8K (4320p) bestbuy.com | 4K (2160p) bestbuy.com |
| Autofocus | 5850 bestbuy.com | Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF) fujifilm-x.com |
| Viewfinder | Electronic bestbuy.com | Electronic bestbuy.com |
| Weight | 1.5 pounds bestbuy.com | 1.2 pounds bestbuy.com |
| Starting MSRP | $4,399.00 bestbuy.com | $1,699.99 bestbuy.com |
Not yet sourced — Canon EOS R5 Mark II: Stabilization, Burst. No manufacturer, official or retailer source we read publishes these yet; we don't estimate them.
Pick Canon EOS R5 Mark II if
- More resolution — 45 MP vs 26.1 MP (bestbuy.com, bestbuy.com)
Pick Fujifilm X-T4 if
- Lighter — 1.2 lb vs 1.5 lb (bestbuy.com, bestbuy.com)
- Lower starting price — $1,699 vs $4,399 (bestbuy.com, bestbuy.com)
Verdict: The EOS R5 Mark II offers more resolution (45 MP vs 26.1 MP); the Fujifilm X-T4 counters with lighter (1.2 lb vs 1.5 lb) and lower starting price ($1,699 vs $4,399).
Canon EOS R5 Mark II lists at $3,899 while Fujifilm X T4 lists at $1,699 — Fujifilm X T4 undercuts Canon EOS R5 Mark II by $2,200 (129%).
Winner: Canon EOS R5 Mark II
Canon EOS R5 Mark II: 8.5/10
Fujifilm X T4: 7/10
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Canon EOS R5 Mark II | Fujifilm X T4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | 35mm Full Frame (36 x 24 mm) | APS-C (23.6 x 15.7 mm) |
| Resolution | 45 megapixels | 26.1 megapixels |
| ISO range | 100 | ISO80 / 100 / 125 / 25600 / 51200 |
| Video | 8K (4320p) | 4K (2160p) |
| Autofocus | 5850 | Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF) |
| Weight | 1.5 pounds | 1.2 pounds |
Canon EOS R5 Mark II
What works
- 8K video capability
- Improved autofocus with Dual Pixel CMOS II
What doesn't
- Very high price
- Battery life lower than some competitors
Fujifilm X T4
What works
- In-body image stabilization (5‑stop)
- Robust weather sealing
- Excellent color science and film simulations
What doesn't
- No 8K video
- Battery life shorter than some rivals
Bottom line
Our pick: Canon EOS R5 Mark II.
View full comparison on GoodPickr
Related Comparisons
- OM System OM-1 Mark II vs Sony Alpha 1
- Fujifilm X100VI vs Sony RX1 IV
- Sony Alpha 1 vs Canon EOS R5C
- Canon EOS R7 vs Sony Alpha 1
- Sony Alpha a6400 vs Fujifilm XT30 II
- Canon EOS R5 C vs Sony FX3
- Canon EOS R1 vs Canon EOS R5
- Canon EOS R3 Mirrorless Camera Body Only vs Sony Alpha 1 II Mirrorless Camera Body Only
- Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Sony A7 V
- Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro vs Remarkable Paper Pro
- Fujifilm X100V vs Ricoh GR III
- Canon EOS R6 vs Sony Alpha A6700
People also compared
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Sony A7 IV Mirrorless Camera
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Nikon Z 8 Mirrorless Camera
- Canon EOS R5 Mark II vs Nikon Z 9 Mirrorless Camera
- Sony A7R V vs Canon EOS R5 Mark II Cameras
Buying guides · In-depth comparisons
View Interactive Comparison →Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.
GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners