Ricoh GR IIIx vs Sony Alpha A6700

Ricoh GR IIIx
Ricoh GR IIIx
Sony Alpha A6700
Sony Alpha A6700

Verdict: The Sony Alpha A6700 outperforms the Ricoh GR IIIx in almost every technical category—its 26 MP sensor, 4K 60 fps video, and 5‑axis IBIS give it a clear edge for hybrid shooters (per DPReview and Sony). The GR IIIx remains a superb pocket‑sized option for street photographers who prioritize discretion and lens quality, but its lack of 4K video and stabilization limit its versatility. Overall, the A6700 scores higher on performance, features, and longevity, making it the stronger all‑rounder.

Winner: Sony Alpha A6700

Ricoh GR IIIx: 6.5/10

Sony Alpha A6700: 8.5/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Ricoh GR IIIxSony Alpha A6700
sensor_resolution24.2 MP26 MP
sensor_typeAPS-C CMOSAPS-C Exmor R CMOS
max_video_resolution1080p 60fps4K 60fps
image_stabilization5‑axis IBIS

Ricoh GR IIIx

What works

  • Ultra‑compact 62 mm×99 mm×33 mm body
  • High‑quality 28 mm f/2.8 lens with 9‑element design
  • Excellent JPEG rendering for street photography

What doesn't

  • No 4K video recording
  • Limited battery life (~200 shots per charge)
  • No in‑body image stabilization

Sony Alpha A6700

What works

  • Interchangeable‑lens system with extensive Sony E‑mount ecosystem
  • 4K 60fps video with full pixel read‑out
  • 5‑axis in‑body image stabilization

What doesn't

  • Larger and heavier than compact cameras (≈ 422 g body only)
  • Higher price point
  • Menu system can be complex for beginners

Bottom line

Our pick: Sony Alpha A6700.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners