Fujifilm X100VI vs Ricoh GR IIIx By Billy G. · Founder & Lead Editor
Fujifilm X100VI
vs
Ricoh GR IIIx
Ricoh GR IIIx
✓
Verified
Confidence: 89%
Verdict: Fujifilm X100VI wins on versatility and image quality; Ricoh GR IIIx wins on pocketability and minimalist design.
How we scored it
Spec verification Owner sentiment Live pricing (4h refresh) Editorial review
Our methodology →
Winner: Fujifilm X100VI
Spec-by-spec comparison Fujifilm X100VI Ricoh GR IIIx Resolution 40.2 MP 24.2 MP Focal Length (equiv) 35mm f/2 40mm f/2.8 IBIS Yes (5.5-stop) Shake reduction only Viewfinder Hybrid OVF/EVF None Dimensions 128×75×55mm 122×67×34mm Weight 521g 262g
Fujifilm X100VI What works 40MP X-Trans sensor with IBIS — highest-resolution compact street camera Hybrid OVF/EVF finder — unique and immersive shooting experience Fujifilm film simulations for outstanding in-camera JPEGs What doesn't Supply constrained since launch — hard to find at MSRP Larger than GR IIIx — not truly shirt-pocketable Higher price at ~$1,599 vs GR IIIx at ~$999 Ricoh GR IIIx What works Shirt-pocket size — genuinely unobtrusive for street work 40mm equivalent suits portrait-street and environmental portraiture 262g body weight — lightest APS-C camera available What doesn't No viewfinder — bright sunlight LCD composition is challenging f/2.8 aperture at 40mm vs X100VI's f/2 at 35mm — less low-light advantage No IBIS — slower shutter speeds require good technique Bottom line Our pick: Fujifilm X100VI .
View full comparison on GoodPickr
Related Comparisons Browse all comparisons
View Interactive Comparison →
Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.
GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons