Verdict: The Nikon Z7 II outperforms the Ricoh GR III in resolution (45 MP vs 24 MP per DPReview), autofocus coverage (493‑point vs 49‑point per Imaging Resource), and video capabilities (4K 60p vs 1080p 60 per DxOMark). However, the GR III’s 28 mm f/2.8 lens and sub‑$1,000 price make it a more practical choice for street photographers (price and size advantage noted by CNET). Overall, the Z7 II is the superior tool for high‑resolution, professional work, while the GR III excels in portability and cost‑effectiveness.
Winner: Nikon Z7 II
Nikon Z7 II: 8.5/10
Ricoh GR III: 7.5/10
| Nikon Z7 II | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | 45.7 MP full-frame BSI CMOS | 24.2 MP APS‑C BSI CMOS |
| Autofocus | 493‑point hybrid AF system | — |
| Video | 4K 60p video recording | — |
| Battery | ≈420 shots per charge (per DPReview) | ≈200 shots per charge (per DPReview) |
| Lens | — | 28 mm f/2.8 fixed prime |
| ISO | — | 100‑102400 native range |
Our pick: Nikon Z7 II.
View full comparison on GoodPickr
Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.
GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners