Nikon Z7 II vs Ricoh GR III

Nikon Z7 II
Nikon Z7 II
Ricoh GR III

Verdict: The Nikon Z7 II outperforms the Ricoh GR III in resolution (45 MP vs 24 MP per DPReview), autofocus coverage (493‑point vs 49‑point per Imaging Resource), and video capabilities (4K 60p vs 1080p 60 per DxOMark). However, the GR III’s 28 mm f/2.8 lens and sub‑$1,000 price make it a more practical choice for street photographers (price and size advantage noted by CNET). Overall, the Z7 II is the superior tool for high‑resolution, professional work, while the GR III excels in portability and cost‑effectiveness.

Winner: Nikon Z7 II

Nikon Z7 II: 8.5/10

Ricoh GR III: 7.5/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Nikon Z7 IIRicoh GR III
Sensor45.7 MP full-frame BSI CMOS24.2 MP APS‑C BSI CMOS
Autofocus493‑point hybrid AF system—
Video4K 60p video recording—
Battery≈420 shots per charge (per DPReview)≈200 shots per charge (per DPReview)
Lens—28 mm f/2.8 fixed prime
ISO—100‑102400 native range

Nikon Z7 II

What works

  • 45 MP resolution for detailed prints
  • Robust weather‑sealed magnesium body
  • Fast 493‑point AF with eye‑detect

What doesn't

  • High launch price
  • Larger and heavier than compact alternatives

Ricoh GR III

What works

  • Ultra‑compact pocket size
  • Sharp 28 mm f/2.8 lens ideal for street shooting
  • Excellent image quality for its class

What doesn't

  • Fixed focal length limits versatility
  • Shorter battery life than larger bodies

Bottom line

Our pick: Nikon Z7 II.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners