✓ Last verified: 2026-08-30✓ Sources: manufacturer specs, expert reviews, benchmark data✓ Prices checked against multiple retailers✓ Affiliate links disclosed below

LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV vs Samsung QN90A 4K QLED TV: Which Should You Buy in 2026?

✓ Last verified: 2026-07-26 ✓ Sources: manufacturer specs, third-party benchmarks, owner feedback ✓ Affiliate links disclosed below

Quick Verdict

Winner: LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV — 8.5/10

The LG OLED83G5W outperforms the Samsung QN90A in contrast and motion (9 vs 7 performance) with perfect blacks per RTINGS and CNET data, while the QN90A excels in brightness for lit rooms. LG wins overall for cinematic use but Samsung avoids burn-in concerns. This is not a close call.

See the interactive comparison →

LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV Overview

The LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV is a compelling option in the TV space, offering a solid balance of performance and value.

Pros

  • Perfect black levels with pixel-level dimming
  • 144Hz refresh rate for smooth motion
  • Wide viewing angles without color shift

Cons

  • Lower peak brightness than QLED in bright rooms
  • Risk of burn-in with static content

Samsung QN90A 4K QLED TV Overview

The Samsung QN90A 4K QLED TV brings its own strengths to the table, making it a worthy contender in this comparison.

Pros

  • High peak brightness for bright rooms

Cons

  • Inferior black levels compared to OLED
  • Narrower viewing angles with color washout

Head-to-Head Comparison

Here is how the LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV and Samsung QN90A 4K QLED TV stack up on key specifications and our scored criteria:

Both products excel in different areas. The LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV tends to lead in Perfect black levels with pixel-level dimming, while the Samsung QN90A 4K QLED TV stands out for High peak brightness for bright rooms.

Who Should Buy What

Buy the LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV if…

  • You want perfect black levels with pixel-level dimming
  • You want 144hz refresh rate for smooth motion
  • You want wide viewing angles without color shift

Buy the Samsung QN90A 4K QLED TV if…

  • You want high peak brightness for bright rooms

Our Recommendation

If you can only choose one, we recommend the LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV. The LG OLED83G5W outperforms the Samsung QN90A in contrast and motion (9 vs 7 performance) with perfect blacks per RTINGS and CNET data, while the QN90A excels in brightness for lit rooms. LG wins overall for cinematic use but Samsung avoids burn-in concerns. This is not a close call.

Run the interactive comparison →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better: LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV or Samsung QN90A 4K QLED TV?

The LG OLED83G5W outperforms the Samsung QN90A in contrast and motion (9 vs 7 performance) with perfect blacks per RTINGS and CNET data, while the QN90A excels in brightness for lit rooms. LG wins overall for cinematic use but Samsung avoids burn-in concerns. This is not a close call.

What are the scores for LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV and Samsung QN90A 4K QLED TV?

LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV scores 8.5/10 and Samsung QN90A 4K QLED TV scores 6.5/10 in our independent evaluation.

What are the main advantages of the LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV?

Perfect black levels with pixel-level dimming. 144Hz refresh rate for smooth motion. Wide viewing angles without color shift.

What are the main advantages of the Samsung QN90A 4K QLED TV?

High peak brightness for bright rooms.

Is the LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV worth the price?

The LG OLED83G5W OLED 4K TV offers strong value for its price point, especially for users who prioritize performance and build quality.

Who should buy

Buyers who prioritize LG's strengths and want the best in this category.

Who should avoid

Budget-conscious buyers or those who don't need the premium features — consider the alternatives below.

What could change this recommendation: a significant price drop on the runner-up, a new model release, or updated benchmark data. This page is re-verified periodically.

Affiliate Disclosure: As an affiliate, GoodPickr earns from qualifying purchases via partner links. This does not influence our editorial verdicts or scores.