Verdict: The Susvara outperforms the HD 800S in sheer resolution and distortion metrics (ASR reports 0.001% THD+N vs ~0.02% for the HD 800S) and offers a wider soundstage, but its $5,000 price and weight make it a niche choice. The HD 800S delivers excellent imaging at a fraction of the cost and is comfortable for long sessions, though it cannot match the Susvara’s micro‑detail. For most audiophiles, the HD 800S provides the best balance of performance and value, while the Susvara is reserved for professionals who need the ultimate detail and have the budget to support it.
HIFIMAN Susvara lists at $4,999 while Sennheiser HD 800S lists at $1,599 — Sennheiser HD 800S undercuts HIFIMAN Susvara by $3,400 (213%).
Winner: Sennheiser HD 800S
HIFIMAN Susvara: 9/10
Sennheiser HD 800S: 7.5/10
| HIFIMAN Susvara | Sennheiser HD 800S | |
|---|---|---|
| Driver Type | Planar Magnetic | Dynamic |
| Impedance | 30 Ω | 300 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 101 dB SPL/V | 102 dB SPL/V |
| Frequency Response | 8 Hz–65 kHz | 6 Hz–56 kHz |
Our pick: Sennheiser HD 800S.
The Focal Utopia 2022 uses 40 mm beryllium dynamic drivers at 104 dB sensitivity while the HIFIMAN Susvara relies on planar magnetic stealth magnets at 83 dB. Reviews give the Susvara the edge in resolution and soundstage over the Utopia.
View full comparison on GoodPickr
Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.
GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons