Verdict: The Sennheiser HD 800 S outperforms the HD 660S2 in soundstage width and treble extension according to Audio Science Review and RTINGS data, but the HD 660S2 provides comparable midrange at roughly half the price. The HD 800 S weighs 70 g more and costs significantly more, making it the choice for dedicated listening rooms. Both share 300 Ω impedance requiring amplification.
Winner: Sennheiser HD 800 S
Sennheiser HD 660S2: 7.5/10
Sennheiser HD 800 S: 8.5/10
| Sennheiser HD 660S2 | Sennheiser HD 800 S | |
|---|---|---|
| impedance | 300 Ω | 300 Ω |
| frequency_response | 6 Hz – 41,500 Hz | 4 Hz – 51,000 Hz |
| weight_g | 260 | 330 |
| driver_size | 38 mm | 56 mm |
Our pick: Sennheiser HD 800 S.
The Sennheiser HD 660S2 uses a 300-ohm open-back design with warmer tuning, while the Sony MDR-MV1 runs at 48 ohms in an open-back reference configuration. The HD 660S2 edges out for critical listening detail over the MDR-MV1 in head-to-head tests.
The Beyerdynamic DT 900 Pro X uses 48 ohm impedance while the Sennheiser HD 660S2 uses 300 ohms. The DT 900 Pro X costs less and needs no dedicated amp for comparable open-back performance.
The Focal Utopia uses beryllium drivers in an 80-ohm open-back design while the Sennheiser HD 800 S relies on ring-radiator drivers in a 56-ohm open-back chassis. The Utopia is the more expensive and analytical choice.
The Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro uses 250 ohm Tesla drivers while the Sennheiser HD 660S2 uses a 300 ohm transducer. Direct comparisons show the DT 1990 Pro delivers sharper treble than the smoother HD 660S2.
The HiFiMan Sundara uses planar drivers while the Sennheiser HD 660S2 uses dynamic drivers. Sundara delivers wider soundstage and stronger value than the HD 660S2.
View full comparison on GoodPickr
Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.
GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons