Nike Air Max 270 vs Adidas Ultraboost 24
Adidas Ultraboost 24 wins — Ultraboost wins if you want one shoe for running and casual wear — BOOST foam energy return and Continental rubber grip …
Scores: Nike Air Max 270 8/10 · Adidas Ultraboost 24 9/10
Ultraboost wins if you want one shoe for running and casual wear — BOOST foam energy return and Continental rubber grip are performance advantages Air Max doesn't offer. Air Max 270 wins for pure casual lifestyle comfort if running isn't part of your routine — the air cushion heel is more comfortable for standing long hours.
Nike Air Max 270 lists at $160 while Adidas Ultraboost 24 lists at $190 — Nike Air Max 270 undercuts Adidas Ultraboost 24 by $30 (19%).
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Nike Air Max 270 | Adidas Ultraboost 24 |
|---|
| sole | Air Max 270 unit (largest Air unit ever), 32mm at heel | BOOST foam midsole (full-length), Continental rubber outsole |
|---|
| upper | Engineered mesh | Primeknit+ adaptive sock knit |
|---|
| weight | 300g (US 10) | 285g (US 10) |
|---|
| cushion | Foam + visible Air Max heel unit | BOOST foam energy return |
|---|
| purpose | Lifestyle/casual | Running (daily trainer) + lifestyle |
|---|
| fit | True to size, wide toe box | Snug heel, roomy toe |
|---|
Nike Air Max 270
What works
- 32mm Air unit is the tallest Nike Air heel ever produced — heel cushion is immediately noticeable standing up
- Lifestyle design works across casual, streetwear, and light travel without looking like performance footwear
- Wide toe box is comfortable for wider feet that struggle in performance-first shoes
What doesn't
- Not designed for running — Air heel unit doesn't provide energy return for forward propulsion
- 300g weight is heavy for a lifestyle shoe — On Clouds and Hokas are lighter for daily wear
- Air bag can develop squeaks after 6-12 months of daily wear on certain surfaces
Adidas Ultraboost 24
What works
- BOOST foam provides measurable energy return — you feel the push-off at toe-off that Air Max foam doesn't provide
- Continental rubber outsole is wet-surface traction certified — grip in rain is noticeably better than Air Max's basic rubber
- Dual-purpose: equally appropriate for 5-mile runs and office casual wear without switching shoes
What doesn't
- $190 is $30 more than Air Max 270 for a shoe that needs replacing at 400-500 miles if used for running
- Primeknit upper shows scuffs and creases after repeated wear more visibly than Air Max mesh
- Heel counter is firm — running-specific fit feels stiff for pure casual wear
Bottom line
Our pick: Adidas Ultraboost 24.
Browse all comparisons | Trending