Verdict: The Adidas Ultraboost 24 outperforms the Nike Air Max 270 for serious running with 20% better energy return in lab tests from Runner's World and higher comfort scores on 500-mile wear tests from RunRepeat. Nike's lower price and stylish design make it preferable for lifestyle wear, but it trails in stability and cushioning longevity. Overall the Ultraboost 24 is the stronger choice for performance-focused buyers.
Nike Air Max 270 lists at $150 while Adidas Ultraboost 24 lists at $180 — Nike Air Max 270 undercuts Adidas Ultraboost 24 by $30 (20%).
Winner: Adidas Ultraboost 24
Nike Air Max 270: 7/10
Adidas Ultraboost 24: 8.5/10
| Nike Air Max 270 | Adidas Ultraboost 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 300 g | 310 g |
| Heel-to-Toe Drop | 8 mm | 10 mm |
| Cushioning | Air Max unit + foam | Boost foam midsole |
| Upper Material | Mesh with synthetic overlays | Primeknit+ engineered mesh |
Our pick: Adidas Ultraboost 24. It edges out the alternative on energy-returning boost foam delivers high cushioning and bounce. That said, Nike Air Max 270 still wins on large visible air unit provides responsive cushioning under heel — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.
View full comparison on GoodPickr
GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons