Adidas Ultraboost 24 vs Nike Air Max 270

Adidas Ultraboost 24
Adidas Ultraboost 24
Nike Air Max 270
Nike Air Max 270

Verdict: Adidas Ultraboost 24 outperforms the Nike Air Max 270 in energy return and durability according to Runner's World and RunRepeat data, making it the stronger choice for dedicated running. The Air Max 270 offers a lower drop and lighter feel but trails in long-run cushioning retention. The 270's 2018 release date also places it behind current standards in foam technology.

Winner: Adidas Ultraboost 24

Adidas Ultraboost 24: 8.2/10

Nike Air Max 270: 6.8/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Adidas Ultraboost 24Nike Air Max 270
Weight (men's size 9)10.4 oz10.2 oz
Heel-to-toe drop10 mm8 mm
MidsoleBoost foam with Light BoostAir unit with React foam
Upper materialPrimeknit+Engineered mesh

Adidas Ultraboost 24

What works

  • Energy-returning Boost midsole delivers 20% more bounce than prior version (per Runner's World)
  • Primeknit+ upper provides adaptive fit with reduced waste
  • Continental rubber outsole offers 15% better grip in wet conditions

What doesn't

  • Heavier than many daily trainers at 10.4 oz
  • Higher drop may not suit forefoot strikers

Nike Air Max 270

What works

  • Large visible Air unit provides plush heel cushioning
  • React foam adds responsive forefoot feel
  • Lower 8 mm drop suits a wider range of running styles

What doesn't

  • Less energy return than Boost foam on long runs
  • Mesh upper shows wear faster after 300 miles

Bottom line

Our pick: Adidas Ultraboost 24.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons