Verdict: The 2012 Escape is the better buy — more refined, safer, and with better fuel economy — unless you specifically need 4WD capability for genuine off-pavement use, where the first-gen body-on-frame architecture gave it an edge.
How we scored itSpec verificationOwner sentimentLive pricing (4h refresh)Editorial reviewOur methodology →
Winner: 2012 Ford Escape
2002 Ford Escape: 6.5/10
2012 Ford Escape: 7.9/10
Spec-by-spec comparison
2002 Ford Escape
2012 Ford Escape
Base Engine
2.0L I4, 127 hp
2.5L I4, 171 hp
Optional Engine
3.0L V6, 201 hp
3.0L V6, 240 hp
Transmission
4-speed automatic
6-speed automatic
Combined MPG (V6)
~21 MPG
~20 MPG
Electronic Stability Control
Not available
Standard all trims
NHTSA Overall
4 stars
4 stars
2002 Ford Escape
What works
Body-on-frame architecture handles rough terrain and heavy towing better
Lower purchase price — frequently available under $5,000
Simpler mechanicals on the 2.0L four-cylinder variant
What doesn't
No stability control — 3-star NHTSA rollover rating
3.0L V6 oil consumption up to 1 qt/1,000 miles at higher mileage
4-speed automatic transmission feels dated
2012 Ford Escape
What works
Standard ESC (AdvanceTrac) across all 2012 trims — significant safety advantage
6-speed automatic is smoother and more fuel-efficient than 2002's 4-speed