2002 Ford Escape vs Ford Escape
Ford Escape
Verdict: The Ford Escape wins decisively with 42 mpg combined (per EPA) versus 23 mpg combined on the 2002 model (per Edmunds archives), plus 163 hp versus 127 hp and standard automatic emergency braking (per IIHS). The 2002 Escape trails on cargo by 7.8 cubic feet and lacks any advanced safety tech. This is not a close call.
How we scored it
Spec verificationOwner sentimentLive pricing (4h refresh)Editorial review
Our methodology
Winner: Ford Escape
2002 Ford Escape: 4.5/10
Ford Escape: 8/10
Spec-by-spec comparison
| 2002 Ford Escape | Ford Escape | |
|---|---|---|
| engine | 2.0L inline-4 | 2.5L hybrid inline-4 |
| horsepower | 127 hp | 163 hp |
| fuel_economy | 22 city / 27 hwy mpg | 42 city / 36 hwy mpg |
| cargo_space | 29.7 cubic feet | 37.5 cubic feet |
2002 Ford Escape
What works
- Low purchase price on used market
- Simple mechanical design for easy repairs
- Available all-wheel drive option
What doesn't
- Poor fuel economy by modern standards
- Lacks modern safety features like blind-spot monitoring
Ford Escape
What works
- Strong hybrid fuel economy
- Updated safety suite with automatic emergency braking
- More interior space and modern infotainment
What doesn't
- Higher starting price than used older models
- Hybrid system adds complexity to maintenance
Bottom line
Our pick: Ford Escape.
View full comparison on GoodPickr
Related Comparisons
- Allen Edmonds Park Avenue Oxford vs Thursday Boot Co. President Oxford
- Ford F-150 Lightning Pro vs Tesla Cybertruck AWD
- Rivian R1T (Dual Motor) vs Ford F-150 Lightning Extended Range
- Ford F-150 XLT (2025) vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500 LT (2025)
- Ford F-150 Lightning vs Rivian R1T
- Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Tesla Model Y
- 2002 Ford Escape vs 2012 Ford Escape
- 2026 Ford Escape vs 2018 Ford Escape
- 2025 BMW i4 vs 2026 Ford Escape
- Ford Ranger 2026 vs Toyota Tacoma 2026
- Ford F-150 vs Chevrolet Silverado 1500
- ProtonVPN vs Mullvad
People also compared
GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons