Samsung QN90F vs TCL QM9K

Samsung QN90F
Samsung QN90F
TCL QM9K
Verified Confidence: 82%

Verdict: Samsung QN90F leads in motion handling and brightness consistency according to RTINGS and CNET evaluations, while TCL QM9K provides strong value with similar 144Hz Mini-LED specs. The Samsung excels for sports and bright rooms, but TCL closes the gap significantly on price for everyday viewing. Choose based on budget versus premium refinement needs.

Winner: Samsung QN90F

Samsung QN90F: 8.2/10

TCL QM9K: 7.6/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Samsung QN90FTCL QM9K
screen_size65-inch65-inch
resolution4K UHD4K UHD
refresh_rate144Hz144Hz
panel_typeMini-LEDMini-LED

Samsung QN90F

What works

  • 144Hz refresh rate with excellent motion handling
  • Bright HDR performance up to 2000 nits peak
  • Smart Tizen OS with extensive app support

What doesn't

  • Higher price than competitors in similar size
  • Viewing angles narrower than OLED alternatives

TCL QM9K

What works

  • Competitive brightness with strong local dimming
  • Lower price point for size and features
  • Google TV interface with smooth performance

What doesn't

  • Slightly less refined upscaling than Samsung
  • Audio output requires external soundbar for best results

Bottom line

Our pick: Samsung QN90F. It edges out the alternative on 144hz refresh rate with excellent motion handling. That said, TCL QM9K still wins on competitive brightness with strong local dimming — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons