By Billy G. · Founder & Lead EditorVerified May 21 by Billy G.
Samsung QN90Fvs
TCL QM9K
TCL QM9K
Worth-It Score: 74/100WAITSamsung QN90F scores well, but current pricing sits above our fair-price band. Wait for a price drop before pulling the trigger.
✓VerifiedConfidence: 82%
Verdict: Samsung QN90F leads in motion handling and brightness consistency according to RTINGS and CNET evaluations, while TCL QM9K provides strong value with similar 144Hz Mini-LED specs. The Samsung excels for sports and bright rooms, but TCL closes the gap significantly on price for everyday viewing. Choose based on budget versus premium refinement needs.
How we scored itSpec verificationOwner sentimentLive pricing (4h refresh)Editorial reviewOur methodology →
Winner: Samsung QN90F
Samsung QN90F: 8.2/10
TCL QM9K: 7.6/10
Spec-by-spec comparison
Samsung QN90F
TCL QM9K
screen_size
65-inch
65-inch
resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD
refresh_rate
144Hz
144Hz
panel_type
Mini-LED
Mini-LED
Samsung QN90F
What works
144Hz refresh rate with excellent motion handling
Bright HDR performance up to 2000 nits peak
Smart Tizen OS with extensive app support
What doesn't
Higher price than competitors in similar size
Viewing angles narrower than OLED alternatives
TCL QM9K
What works
Competitive brightness with strong local dimming
Lower price point for size and features
Google TV interface with smooth performance
What doesn't
Slightly less refined upscaling than Samsung
Audio output requires external soundbar for best results
Bottom line
Our pick: Samsung QN90F. It edges out the alternative on 144hz refresh rate with excellent motion handling. That said, TCL QM9K still wins on competitive brightness with strong local dimming — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.