By Billy G. · Founder & Lead EditorVerified May 21 by Billy G.
Sony X95LvsSamsung QN90F
Worth-It Score: 75/100WAITSamsung QN90F scores well, but current pricing sits above our fair-price band. Wait for a price drop before pulling the trigger.
✓VerifiedConfidence: 85%
Verdict: Samsung QN90F for bright-room use and gaming with 2500 nits peak brightness and 144Hz refresh rate per RTINGS and CNET tests, while Sony X95L excels in dark-room movie accuracy with superior local dimming. The QN90F wins on features and performance scores but Sony remains close on overall picture quality.
How we scored itSpec verificationOwner sentimentLive pricing (4h refresh)Editorial reviewOur methodology →
Winner: Samsung QN90F
Sony X95L: 8.2/10
Samsung QN90F: 8.5/10
Spec-by-spec comparison
Sony X95L
Samsung QN90F
screen_size
65-inch
65-inch
resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD
refresh_rate
120Hz
144Hz
peak_brightness
2000 nits
2500 nits
Sony X95L
What works
Excellent local dimming with 576 zones
Superior motion handling via XR processor
Accurate color with Cognitive Processor XR
What doesn't
Limited HDMI 2.1 ports (2)
Higher power consumption at 180W
Samsung QN90F
What works
Higher peak brightness for HDR
More HDMI 2.1 ports (4)
Strong anti-glare coating
What doesn't
Less precise local dimming than Sony
Slightly less natural motion
Bottom line
Our pick: Samsung QN90F. It edges out the alternative on higher peak brightness for hdr. That said, Sony X95L still wins on excellent local dimming with 576 zones — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.