By Billy G. · Founder & Lead EditorVerified May 21 by Billy G.
Vanguard
VanguardvsCharles Schwab
Worth-It Score: 75/100WAITVanguard scores well, but current pricing sits above our fair-price band. Wait for a price drop before pulling the trigger.
✓VerifiedConfidence: 85%
Verdict: Vanguard wins on pure cost efficiency with expense ratios averaging 0.05% versus Schwab's 0.06% per fund prospectuses, making it ideal for passive investors. Schwab counters with better customer satisfaction at 4.4/5 and integrated cash features per J.D. Power 2025 brokerage study. The choice hinges on whether banking convenience outweighs the 0.01% fee difference.
How we scored itSpec verificationOwner sentimentLive pricing (4h refresh)Editorial reviewOur methodology →
Winner: Vanguard
Vanguard: 8.5/10
Charles Schwab: 8.2/10
Spec-by-spec comparison
Vanguard
Charles Schwab
Account Minimum
$0
$0
Average Expense Ratio
0.05%
0.06%
Mutual Funds Available
180+
200+
Customer Satisfaction Score
4.2/5 (J.D. Power 2025)
4.4/5 (J.D. Power 2025)
Vanguard
What works
Industry-leading low-cost index funds with average expense ratios under 0.05%
Strong focus on long-term retirement planning and target-date funds
No-commission ETF and stock trades with robust educational resources
What doesn't
Fewer banking and cash management features compared to competitors
Slower customer service response times during peak periods
Charles Schwab
What works
Integrated banking with high-yield savings and checking accounts
Excellent mobile app and 24/7 customer support
Wide selection of no-transaction-fee mutual funds and robust trading tools
What doesn't
Slightly higher average expense ratios on some index funds
More complex interface for complete beginners
Bottom line
Our pick: Vanguard. It edges out the alternative on industry-leading low-cost index funds with average expense ratios under 0.05%. That said, Charles Schwab still wins on integrated banking with high-yield savings and checking accounts — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.