By Billy G. · Founder & Lead EditorVerified May 19 by Billy G.
Synology PhotosvsGoogle Photos
Worth-It Score: 76/100WAIT — WAIT under $3Google Photos scores well, but current pricing sits above our fair-price band. Wait for a price drop before pulling the trigger.
✓VerifiedConfidence: 85%
Verdict: Google Photos wins on AI, search, and convenience — face recognition, natural language search, and zero hardware make it the best photo management system for the vast majority of users. Synology Photos wins on privacy, unlimited storage, and RAW preservation — the right choice for photographers with large libraries who reject cloud processing and are willing to manage their own hardware. Choose based on your priorities: AI convenience → Google Photos; privacy and unlimited RAW storage → Synology.
How we scored itSpec verificationOwner sentimentLive pricing (4h refresh)Editorial reviewOur methodology →
Winner: Google Photos
Synology Photos: 9/10
Google Photos: 9/10
Spec-by-spec comparison
Synology Photos
Google Photos
storage
Unlimited — limited only by NAS hard drive capacity
15GB free; Google One $2.99/mo (100GB), $9.99/mo (2TB), $29.99/mo (5TB)
hardware_required
Synology NAS (DS224+: $300; DS923+: $500)
—
ai_features
On-device face recognition, object detection, location clustering
World-class AI: face recognition, scene detection, object search, memory curation
backup
Mobile app auto-backup from iOS and Android
Auto-backup iOS and Android; Google Takeout for export
sharing
Private album sharing, family portal, external guest links
Shared albums, Google Lens in-app, partner sharing
raw_support
Full RAW file support (CR3, NEF, ARW, DNG)
RAW backup supported but stored as JPEG in UI (RAW preserved in storage)
Synology Photos
What works
Unlimited storage at zero ongoing cost once NAS hardware is purchased — photographers with 100,000+ RAW files pay nothing per month vs Google's $10-30/month for equivalent storage
100% private on-premise storage means photos never leave your network — the only solution where faces, locations, and metadata are processed locally without training any cloud model
Full RAW support with EXIF preservation for CR3, NEF, ARW, and DNG files — Google Photos compresses and strips metadata from RAW files regardless of storage plan
What doesn't
$300-500 NAS hardware required before any photos are stored — the upfront cost takes 2-4 years to recoup vs Google One at $10-30/month
Mobile app face recognition is slower than Google Photos' cloud-processed AI — face grouping on a 50,000-photo library can take days of background processing on NAS hardware
Google Photos
What works
Google's AI face recognition identifies faces across 20 years of photos and groups them accurately across aging — the best-in-class AI photo organization that no self-hosted system approaches
Natural language search 'photos of Mom at Christmas' accurately retrieves semantically relevant images from a 100,000+ photo library — Synology's local AI cannot match this search quality
Zero hardware to purchase or maintain — $2.99/month for 100GB gets 10,000+ photos backed up with no NAS, no hard drives, and no power consumption at home
What doesn't
Google processes all photos including faces, locations, and metadata in their cloud AI pipeline — the privacy trade-off is real and non-negotiable
Costs scale: 2TB is $120/year and a 5TB photographer library costs $360/year — Synology NAS hardware pays for itself in 2-4 years for large libraries
Bottom line
Our pick: Google Photos. It edges out the alternative on google's ai face recognition identifies faces across 20 years of photos and groups them accurately across aging — the best-in-class ai photo organization that no self-hosted system approaches. That said, Synology Photos still wins on unlimited storage at zero ongoing cost once nas hardware is purchased — photographers with 100,000+ raw files pay nothing per month vs google's $10-30/month for equivalent storage — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.