Supabase vs Google Firebase

Supabase wins — Supabase wins for web apps and teams that need relational data, portability, and open-source infrastructure

Scores: Supabase 9/10 · Google Firebase 8/10

Supabase wins for web apps and teams that need relational data, portability, and open-source infrastructure. Firebase wins for mobile apps with offline sync requirements and Flutter/React Native development. For new web projects in 2025, Supabase is the stronger default choice.

Spec-by-spec comparison

SupabaseGoogle Firebase
databasePostgreSQL — full relational, row-level security, real-time via websocketsFirestore (NoSQL document) + Realtime Database (legacy JSON tree)
authEmail, OAuth, phone, magic link, SSOEmail, Google, Apple, phone, Anonymous
storageS3-compatible object storageFirebase Storage (Google Cloud Storage under the hood)
edge_functionsDeno-based serverless functionsCloud Functions (Node.js, Python, Go)
pricing$25/month Pro plan (8GB DB, 100GB storage)Blaze plan (pay-as-you-go) — $0.06/100K reads
open_sourceYes — self-hostable on any Postgres server

Supabase

What works

  • Full PostgreSQL means foreign keys, joins, complex queries, and pg extensions — Firestore's document model can't do this
  • Open source and self-hostable — full data portability; you're not locked into Supabase's cloud infrastructure
  • Row Level Security (RLS) at the database layer means auth policies live in the DB, not scattered across application code

What doesn't

  • RLS policy configuration requires SQL knowledge — more complex to set up correctly than Firebase's security rules for non-SQL developers
  • Offline-first and mobile SDK maturity is behind Firebase — Firestore's offline sync is more battle-tested
  • Edge Functions (Deno) have fewer community examples than Firebase Functions (Node) — smaller ecosystem

Google Firebase

What works

  • Firestore's mobile offline sync is the best-in-class for mobile apps — documents sync automatically when connectivity restores
  • 10+ years of production usage means Firebase has the deepest mobile SDK and the largest community answer base
  • Google Cloud integration — BigQuery export, Cloud Storage, and GCP ML services connect natively

What doesn't

  • Firestore document model forces data denormalization — complex relational data requires duplicating fields and writing complex fanout logic
  • Vendor lock-in: Firestore data is not easily portable to another provider or self-hosted
  • Cloud Functions cold starts on the Spark free plan can hit 1-3 seconds — Supabase Edge Functions have more consistent latency

Bottom line

Our pick: Supabase.

Browse all comparisons | Trending