Solo Stove Ranger 2.0 vs Traeger Ironwood 885

Solo Stove Ranger 2.0
Solo Stove Ranger 2.0
Traeger Ironwood 885
Traeger Ironwood 885

Verdict: The Traeger Ironwood 885 outperforms on cooking capacity and precision per multiple owner reports on forums and review sites, beating the Solo Stove Ranger 2.0 by 300+ sq in of usable space and offering Wi-Fi monitoring. The Ranger 2.0 remains better suited for quick portable fires but trails in versatility for dedicated smoking. Traeger takes the win for most users seeking a primary grill.

Winner: Traeger Ironwood 885

Solo Stove Ranger 2.0: 6.5/10

Traeger Ironwood 885: 8/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Solo Stove Ranger 2.0Traeger Ironwood 885
Cooking Area885 sq in
Fuel TypeWoodWood pellets
Weight25 lbs175 lbs
Dimensions19.5 x 19.5 x 15.5 inches53 x 27 x 49 inches

Solo Stove Ranger 2.0

What works

  • Lightweight and portable for camping or small patios
  • Smokeless design reduces smoke output significantly
  • Quick setup with no assembly required

What doesn't

  • Limited cooking surface restricts large meals
  • Requires frequent wood reloading during long sessions

Traeger Ironwood 885

What works

  • Large cooking area supports family-sized meals
  • Precise digital temperature control with Wi-Fi
  • Versatile for smoking, grilling, and baking

What doesn't

  • Heavy and stationary, not portable
  • Higher upfront cost and requires electricity

Bottom line

Our pick: Traeger Ironwood 885.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons