Solo Stove Ranger 2.0 vs Traeger Ironwood 885

Solo Stove Ranger 2.0
Solo Stove Ranger 2.0
Traeger Ironwood 885

Verdict: The Solo Stove Ranger 2.0 excels in weight (5.5 lb) and fuel independence, delivering up to 500 °F with 80% less smoke (per Solo Stove specs). The Traeger Ironwood 885, however, offers a 885 sq in cooking area, ±5 °F temperature precision, and Wi‑Fi control, making it far superior for consistent backyard grilling (per Traeger spec sheet, Wirecutter, OutdoorGearLab). For campers the Ranger is the clear winner; for permanent setups the Ironwood’s features justify its higher price.

Solo Stove Ranger 2.0 lists at $199 while Traeger Ironwood 885 lists at $1,299 — Solo Stove Ranger 2.0 undercuts Traeger Ironwood 885 by $1,100 (553%).

Winner: Traeger Ironwood 885

Solo Stove Ranger 2.0: 6.5/10

Traeger Ironwood 885: 8.5/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Solo Stove Ranger 2.0Traeger Ironwood 885
Cooking Area2.5 sq ft885 sq in
Max Temperature≈500 °F500 °F
Weight5.5 lb
Fuel TypeDry wood
Pellet Hopper Capacity20 lb
Wi‑Fi ConnectivityTraeger‑Connect app

Solo Stove Ranger 2.0

What works

  • Lightweight for backpacking
  • Efficient burn with 80% less smoke
  • No electricity required

What doesn't

  • Limited temperature control
  • Small cooking surface

Traeger Ironwood 885

What works

  • Precise temperature control (±5 °F)
  • Large cooking surface for multiple items
  • Wi‑Fi monitoring and control

What doesn't

  • Requires electricity and pellets
  • Higher upfront cost

Bottom line

Our pick: Traeger Ironwood 885.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners