Verdict: The Samsung QN90B outperforms the TCL 65s525 in brightness, HDR capability, and audio with its Mini LED panel, Neo Quantum Processor, and Object Tracking Sound+ (Google Search). However, it costs $2,599 versus $600 for the TCL, making the latter a strong budget choice (Google Search). For premium HDR in bright rooms, QN90B wins; for cost‑conscious buyers, TCL offers solid 4K performance at a fraction of the price (Google Search).
Samsung QN90B 65 Inch Neo QLED TV lists at $2,199 while TCL 65s525 65 Inch 4K UHD TV lists at $449.99 — TCL 65s525 65 Inch 4K UHD TV undercuts Samsung QN90B 65 Inch Neo QLED TV by $1,749.01 (389%).
Winner: Samsung QN90B 65 Inch Neo QLED TV
Samsung QN90B 65 Inch Neo QLED TV: 8.5/10
TCL 65s525 65 Inch 4K UHD TV: 6.5/10
| Samsung QN90B 65 Inch Neo QLED TV | TCL 65s525 65 Inch 4K UHD TV | |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 4K (2160p) | 3840 × 2160 (4K) |
| Backlight | Full Array Local Dimming | Direct LED |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| HDR | Yes | Dolby Vision, HLG |
Our pick: Samsung QN90B 65 Inch Neo QLED TV.
View full comparison on GoodPickr
Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.
GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners