Safari on macOS Sequoia vs Google Chrome on macOS

Safari on macOS Sequoia wins — Safari on macOS Sequoia outperforms Chrome in battery life by up to 2 hours in mixed-use tests from Notebookcheck and of…

Scores: Safari on macOS Sequoia 8.5/10 · Google Chrome on macOS 7.5/10

Safari on macOS Sequoia outperforms Chrome in battery life by up to 2 hours in mixed-use tests from Notebookcheck and offers better privacy defaults via Intelligent Tracking Prevention. Chrome wins on extension flexibility and site compatibility according to CNET reviews but consumes 30-50% more RAM. For most Mac users Safari is the stronger daily driver while Chrome suits power users needing s...

Spec-by-spec comparison

	Safari on macOS Sequoia	Google Chrome on macOS
rendering_engine	WebKit	Blink
privacy_features	Intelligent Tracking Prevention	Enhanced Safe Browsing
battery_impact	Low	Higher
extension_support	Limited	Extensive

Safari on macOS Sequoia

What works

Native macOS integration with Handoff and Continuity
Superior battery efficiency on Apple Silicon
Strong built-in privacy protections

What doesn't

Limited extension ecosystem compared to competitors
Occasional compatibility issues with legacy web apps

Google Chrome on macOS

What works

Vast Chrome Web Store extension library
Excellent cross-device sync and site compatibility
Frequent updates with broad web standards support

What doesn't

Higher RAM and CPU usage on macOS
More aggressive data collection by default

Bottom line

Our pick: Safari on macOS Sequoia. It edges out the alternative on native macos integration with handoff and continuity. That said, Google Chrome on macOS still wins on vast chrome web store extension library — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.

Browse all comparisons | Trending