Nikon Zf vs Sony Alpha A6700

Nikon Zf
Nikon Zf
Sony Alpha A6700
Sony Alpha A6700

Verdict: Nikon Zf wins for photographers prioritizing full-frame image quality and handling, beating the A6700 by 2 stops in low light per DXOMARK tests. Sony A6700 counters with lighter weight and class-leading AF that tracks subjects 30% more reliably in CNET video tests. Choose Zf for stills or A6700 for hybrid video work.

Winner: Nikon Zf

Nikon Zf: 8.2/10

Sony Alpha A6700: 7.8/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Nikon ZfSony Alpha A6700
SensorFull-frame BSI CMOSAPS-C CMOS
Megapixels24.526
Body Weight3.11 pounds493g
Max ISO6400032000

Nikon Zf

What works

  • Full-frame sensor delivers superior low-light performance with 2 stops better dynamic range than APS-C
  • 5-axis IBIS rated at 8 stops (per Nikon specs)

What doesn't

  • Video limited to 4K/60p with 1.5x crop
  • AF tracking slower than Sony in continuous subject detection

Sony Alpha A6700

What works

  • Best-in-class real-time AF with subject recognition for humans, animals, and vehicles
  • Compact APS-C body with 759 phase-detect points
  • 4K/60p oversampled video without crop

What doesn't

  • APS-C sensor yields narrower dynamic range than full-frame
  • No dedicated exposure compensation dial

Bottom line

Our pick: Nikon Zf.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons