Nikon Zf vs Ricoh GR III

Nikon Zf
Nikon Zf
Ricoh GR III
Ricoh GR III
Verified Confidence: 86%

Verdict: Nikon Zf outperforms on image quality and versatility with its full-frame sensor and AF system per CNET and Wirecutter data, while the Ricoh GR III wins on portability at 257 g versus 630 g. The Nikon takes the edge in 4 of 6 score categories. This is not a close call for most users needing flexibility.

Winner: Nikon Zf

Nikon Zf: 8.5/10

Ricoh GR III: 7/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Nikon ZfRicoh GR III
SensorFull-frameAPS-C
Megapixels24.5 MP24.2 MP
LensZ-mount interchangeableFixed 28mm equiv f/2.8
Body Weight630 g257 g

Nikon Zf

What works

  • Full-frame sensor delivers superior low-light performance and dynamic range
  • Advanced hybrid AF with subject detection
  • Robust IBIS and EVF for versatile shooting

What doesn't

  • Larger and heavier than compact alternatives
  • Higher cost for body and lenses

Ricoh GR III

What works

  • Extremely compact and pocketable design
  • Sharp fixed lens with good macro capability
  • Discreet operation ideal for street photography

What doesn't

  • Fixed lens limits compositional flexibility
  • Smaller sensor than full-frame options

Bottom line

Our pick: Nikon Zf.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons