Nike Metcon 9 vs Reebok Nano X4

Nike Metcon 9
Nike Metcon 9
Reebok Nano X4
Reebok Nano X4
Verified Confidence: 83%

Verdict: Nike Metcon 9 wins for serious lifters needing a stable base, beating the Reebok Nano X4 by 0.7 oz lighter weight and better rope-grip durability per RunRepeat and Runner's World reviews. The Reebok offers more cushioning for dynamic moves but trails in squat stability. Both excel in CrossFit but the Metcon 9's 4 mm drop and reinforced zones give it the edge in longevity.

Winner: Nike Metcon 9

Nike Metcon 9: 8.5/10

Reebok Nano X4: 7.5/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Nike Metcon 9Reebok Nano X4
Weight (men's size 9)10.5 oz11.2 oz
Heel-to-toe drop4 mm5 mm
CushioningReact foam midsoleFloatride Energy Foam
OutsoleRubber with rope-grip zonesRubber with flex grooves

Nike Metcon 9

What works

  • Stable flat platform for heavy lifts
  • Durable upper holds up to rope climbs
  • Versatile for HIIT and Olympic lifting

What doesn't

  • Minimal cushioning for long runs
  • Narrow fit for wide feet

Reebok Nano X4

What works

  • More responsive cushioning for dynamic movements
  • Wider toe box for comfort
  • Good breathability during intense sessions

What doesn't

  • Less stable for max-effort squats
  • Outsole wears faster on abrasive surfaces

Bottom line

Our pick: Nike Metcon 9.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons