LG WT7800CW vs LG WA50R5400AV
LG WT7800CW wins — LG WT7800CW wins for most users due to 0
Scores: LG WT7800CW 8/10 · LG WA50R5400AV 6.5/10
LG WT7800CW wins for most users due to 0.5 cu ft extra capacity and enhanced cleaning performance noted in RTINGS and Consumer Reports reviews. WA50R5400AV trails on load size but matches on TurboDrum and Wi-Fi. The 5.5 cu ft model pulls ahead in family scenarios while the 5.0 cu ft unit suits tighter budgets and spaces.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG WT7800CW | LG WA50R5400AV |
|---|
| Capacity | 5.5 cu ft | 5.0 cu ft |
|---|
| Type | Top Load Impeller | Top Load Impeller |
|---|
| Drum Technology | TurboDrum | TurboDrum |
|---|
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi with SmartThinQ | Wi-Fi with SmartThinQ |
|---|
LG WT7800CW
What works
- Larger 5.5 cu ft capacity handles bigger loads
- Advanced TurboDrum reduces tangling and improves cleaning
- Wi-Fi connectivity for remote monitoring and cycles
What doesn't
- Higher water usage than some HE models
- Impeller design may leave some items less clean than agitator
LG WA50R5400AV
What works
- TurboDrum technology for effective cleaning and reduced tangles
- Wi-Fi enabled for app control and notifications
- Compact footprint suitable for smaller spaces
What doesn't
- Smaller 5.0 cu ft capacity limits large loads
- Fewer advanced cycle options than newer LG models
Bottom line
Our pick: LG WT7800CW.
Browse all comparisons | Trending