LG OLED evo C5 65-inch vs Samsung QN90C Neo QLED 65-inch

LG OLED evo C5 65-inch
Samsung QN90C Neo QLED 65-inch

Decision sheet: the facts that decide it

LG OLED evo C5 65-inch: 7 of 10 decision facts sourced.

Samsung QN90C Neo QLED 65-inch: 7 of 10 decision facts sourced.

LG OLED evo C5 65-inchSamsung QN90C Neo QLED 65-inch
Price todayPrice not yet checkedPrice not yet checked
Screen size65 inches bestbuy.com65 inches bestbuy.com
PanelOLED bestbuy.comLED bestbuy.com
Resolution4K (2160p) bestbuy.com4K (2160p) bestbuy.com
Refresh rate120Hz bestbuy.com120Hz bestbuy.com
HDRYes bestbuy.comYes bestbuy.com
Smart platformwebOS bestbuy.comTizen bestbuy.com
Starting MSRP$2,699.99 bestbuy.com$1,699.99 bestbuy.com

Not yet sourced — LG OLED evo C5 65-inch: Peak brightness, HDMI 2.1 ports, VRR / ALLM. Samsung QN90C Neo QLED 65-inch: Peak brightness, HDMI 2.1 ports, VRR / ALLM. No manufacturer, official or retailer source we read publishes these yet; we don't estimate them.

Pick Samsung QN90C Neo QLED 65-inch if

Skip both if

  • Neither publishes peak brightness, HDMI 2.1 ports or VRR / ALLM yet.

Verdict: Pick the Samsung QN90C if your TV is positioned in a brightly lit room with sun exposure where sustained full-screen glare resistance is critical. The LG C5 wins overall due to its pixel-level precision, superior HDR format compatibility, and updated processing performance.

LG OLED evo C5 65-inch lists at $2,299 while Samsung QN90C Neo QLED 65-inch lists at $1,499 — Samsung QN90C Neo QLED 65-inch undercuts LG OLED evo C5 65-inch by $800 (53%).

Winner: LG OLED evo C5 65-inch

LG OLED evo C5 65-inch: 9.1/10

Samsung QN90C Neo QLED 65-inch: 7.8/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

LG OLED evo C5 65-inchSamsung QN90C Neo QLED 65-inch
Screen size65 inches65 inches
PanelOLEDLED
Resolution4K (2160p)4K (2160p)
Refresh rate120Hz120Hz
HDRYesYes
HDMI ports44

LG OLED evo C5 65-inch

What works

  • Infinite contrast ratio with perfect pixel-level dimming
  • Wide viewing angles without color shift

What doesn't

  • Risk of permanent burn-in with static content

Samsung QN90C Neo QLED 65-inch

What works

  • Significantly higher sustained full-screen brightness
  • Zero risk of permanent image retention or burn-in
  • Excellent anti-reflective screen coating

What doesn't

  • Lacks Dolby Vision HDR support
  • Noticeable blooming around bright objects on dark backgrounds

Bottom line

Our pick: LG OLED evo C5 65-inch.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

Buying guides · In-depth comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners