LG 27GP850-B vs LG 38WN95C-W

LG 27GP850-B
LG 27GP850-B
LG 38WN95C-W
LG 38WN95C-W
Verified Confidence: 86%

Verdict: The LG 38WN95C‑W outshines the 27GP850‑B in color fidelity (98% DCI‑P3 vs 99% sRGB) and HDR capability (DisplayHDR 600 vs 350 nits), making it the superior choice for creators and immersive gamers (RTINGS, Tom's Hardware). However, its 144 Hz refresh is slower than the 165 Hz of the 27GP850‑B, which benefits competitive 1440p gamers (Tom's Hardware). For pure esports performance on a budget, the 27GP850‑B remains compelling, but overall the 38WN95C‑W offers a more versatile experience.

Winner: LG 38WN95C-W

LG 27GP850-B: 7/10

LG 38WN95C-W: 8.5/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

LG 27GP850-BLG 38WN95C-W
Screen Size27 inches38 inches
Resolution2560×14403840×1600
Refresh Rate165 Hz144 Hz
Brightness350 nits600 nits

LG 27GP850-B

What works

  • 1 ms GTG response (per RTINGS)
  • NVIDIA G‑Sync Compatible (per Tom's Hardware)
  • Excellent sRGB coverage 99% (per AnandTech)

What doesn't

  • Limited HDR peak brightness 350 nits (per RTINGS)
  • No USB‑C port (per LG spec sheet)

LG 38WN95C-W

What works

  • Nano IPS with 98% DCI‑P3 (per RTINGS)
  • VESA DisplayHDR 600 (per Tom's Hardware)
  • USB‑C with 60 W PD (per LG spec sheet)

What doesn't

  • Higher price point (per LG pricing)
  • Refresh rate lower than 165 Hz gaming panels (per RTINGS)

Bottom line

Our pick: LG 38WN95C-W.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners