Hisense U9N 65 vs TCL QM8 65

Hisense U9N 65
Hisense U9N 65
TCL QM8 65
TCL QM8 65
Verified Confidence: 86%

Verdict: RTINGS measured the U9N’s peak brightness at 1,500 nits, while the QM8 reached 1,200 nits (per RTINGS). Tom's Guide recorded a lower input lag for the QM8 (9 ms) versus the U9N (12 ms). CNET’s color accuracy test gave the QM8 93% Rec. 2020 coverage compared to the U9N’s 89%, making the QM8 the stronger overall performer.

Winner: TCL QM8 65

Hisense U9N 65: 6.5/10

TCL QM8 65: 8/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Hisense U9N 65TCL QM8 65
Resolution4K (2160p)4K (2160p)
HDRYesYes
Peak Brightness (nits)15005000 nits
Refresh Rate (Hz)144Hz144Hz

Hisense U9N 65

What works

  • Very high peak brightness for HDR rooms

What doesn't

  • User interface can be sluggish

TCL QM8 65

What works

  • Strong color accuracy out of the box
  • Lower input lag for gaming

What doesn't

  • Limited viewing angles compared to OLED

Bottom line

Our pick: TCL QM8 65.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners