Verdict: The Susvara’s measured THD+N of 0.001 % (per Audio Science Review) gives it a resolution edge, while the HD 800 S’s frequency response up to 54 kHz and low distortion of 0.02 % (per Head‑Fi) provide excellent reference performance. Wirecutter rates the HD 800 S as the best value audiophile headphone (per Wirecutter). Overall, the Susvara wins on pure performance, but the HD 800 S delivers a stronger value proposition.
HIFIMAN Susvara lists at $5,999 while Sennheiser HD 800 S lists at $1,699 — Sennheiser HD 800 S undercuts HIFIMAN Susvara by $4,300 (253%).
Winner: HIFIMAN Susvara
HIFIMAN Susvara: 8.5/10
Sennheiser HD 800 S: 7.5/10
| HIFIMAN Susvara | Sennheiser HD 800 S | |
|---|---|---|
| Driver | 50mm planar magnetic | 56mm dynamic |
| Impedance | 25 Ω | 300 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB SPL/V | 102 dB SPL/V |
| Frequency Response | 5‑65 kHz | 8‑54 kHz |
Our pick: HIFIMAN Susvara.
The Focal Utopia uses a beryllium dynamic driver while the Sennheiser HD 800 S employs a ring-radiator transducer. Direct comparisons usually rate the Utopia higher in resolution and the HD 800 S wider in soundstage.
The Focal Utopia 2022 uses dynamic drivers while the Hifiman Susvara employs planar magnetics. Headphone forums consistently rate the Susvara higher for resolution and soundstage depth.
View full comparison on GoodPickr
Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.
GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners