Coros Pace 3 vs Garmin Forerunner 265

By Billy G. · Founder & Lead EditorVerified Jun 25 by Billy G.

Verdict: Garmin Forerunner 265 wins overall with richer analytics and AMOLED screen, beating the Coros Pace 3 on features by 3 points. The Pace 3 counters with superior battery life of 38 hours GPS versus 20 hours and lighter weight per manufacturer specs. Choose based on whether battery or data depth matters more.

Winner: Garmin Forerunner 265

Coros Pace 3: 7.5/10

Garmin Forerunner 265: 8.5/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

	Coros Pace 3	Garmin Forerunner 265
Display	1.2-inch MIP, 240x240	1.3-inch AMOLED, 416x416
Battery Life	Up to 38 hours GPS	Up to 20 hours GPS
Weight	27g (nylon band)	39g
GPS	Dual-frequency	Multi-band

Bottom line

Our pick: Garmin Forerunner 265.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

• Coros Vertix 2S vs Suunto Vertical
• COROS Vertix 2S vs Garmin Fenix 8
• Garmin Fenix 9 vs Apple Watch Ultra 3
• Withings Body Comp vs Garmin Index S2
• Garmin Approach S70 vs Bushnell Ion Elite GPS Watch
• Zoom Workplace Pro vs Google Meet (Workspace Business Starter)
• Garmin Vivomove Trend vs Withings ScanWatch 2
• Garmin Epix Pro Gen 2 47MM vs Polar Vantage V3
• Garmin Forerunner 970 vs Garmin Forerunner 965
• Garmin Forerunner 970 vs Apple Watch Ultra 4
• Apple Watch Ultra 4 vs Garmin Fenix 8X Solar
• Eufy SpaceView S vs Infant Optics DXR-8 Pro

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons