Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4o

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
GPT-4o
GPT-4o

Verdict: Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms GPT-4o on coding benchmarks by 4-6 points and handles 56% longer contexts, while GPT-4o delivers responses 30-50% faster with full voice/video support per Artificial Analysis and OpenAI benchmarks. Claude wins for depth; GPT-4o wins for speed and multimodality.

Winner: Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 8.5/10

GPT-4o: 8/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Claude 3.5 SonnetGPT-4o
Context Window200K tokens128K tokens
Release Date2024-062024-05
Multimodal InputText and imagesText, images, audio, video
Knowledge Cutoff2024-042023-10

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

What works

  • 200K token context window supports longer documents
  • Strong coding and reasoning benchmarks (e.g. 92.0% on HumanEval)
  • Detailed, structured responses with fewer hallucinations on complex tasks

What doesn't

  • Slower response speed than GPT-4o in real-time chat
  • No native voice or video input support

GPT-4o

What works

  • Fastest inference speed among frontier models
  • Native real-time voice and video capabilities
  • Broad multimodal support across text, vision and audio

What doesn't

  • Smaller 128K context window limits very long documents
  • More prone to verbosity on technical reasoning tasks

Bottom line

Our pick: Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons