BenQ ScreenBar Halo vs Xiaomi Mi Monitor Light Bar

Xiaomi Mi Monitor Light Bar wins — Xiaomi wins for task lighting only — at $35, it delivers the same glare-free illumination that BenQ provides for front l…

Scores: BenQ ScreenBar Halo 9/10 · Xiaomi Mi Monitor Light Bar 8/10

Xiaomi wins for task lighting only — at $35, it delivers the same glare-free illumination that BenQ provides for front lighting at 16% of the cost. BenQ ScreenBar Halo earns its $219 price specifically for the RGB backlight bias lighting feature, which genuinely reduces eye fatigue in dark room sessions. Don't pay $219 for BenQ unless the backlight is specifically what you need.

BenQ ScreenBar Halo lists at $219 while Xiaomi Mi Monitor Light Bar lists at $35 — Xiaomi Mi Monitor Light Bar undercuts BenQ ScreenBar Halo by $184 (526%).

Spec-by-spec comparison

BenQ ScreenBar HaloXiaomi Mi Monitor Light Bar
front_light500 lux illumination range, 2700K-6500K color temperatureAdjustable 25-600 lux, 2700K-6500K color temperature
backlightRGB backlight behind monitor — reduces eye strain from contrast ratio between screen and dark roomNone — front task lighting only
auto_dimmingSmart auto-dimming sensor adjusts based on ambient lightManual control via touch bar on unit
controlDedicated wireless dial controller — no on-unit buttons neededTouch control strip on bar top
glareAsymmetric optical design prevents light hitting screen surfaceAsymmetric optical design (comparable to BenQ's approach)
mountingCounter-weight clip, fits most monitors 10-30mm thickCounter-weight clip, USB-C or USB-A power

BenQ ScreenBar Halo

What works

  • RGB backlight behind the monitor fills wall bias lighting — reduces the screen/ambient contrast that causes eye fatigue during long sessions
  • Wireless dial controller allows precise color temperature and brightness adjustment without reaching up to the bar
  • Smart auto-dimming maintains consistent lux as room conditions change without manual adjustment

What doesn't

  • $219 is $184 more than the Xiaomi equivalent — expensive for a monitor light bar
  • USB-A power only — requires an available USB-A port or USB hub

Xiaomi Mi Monitor Light Bar

What works

  • $35 vs $219 — delivers the same asymmetric front task lighting with no screen glare at 16% of BenQ's price
  • USB-C power option is available — useful for monitors with USB-C hub ports
  • Asymmetric optics match BenQ's glare-free illumination quality at 600 lux maximum

What doesn't

  • No backlight — if bias lighting for eye fatigue is the goal, BenQ Halo's RGB backlight is the specific feature that justifies its cost
  • Touch control strip requires reaching up to the bar — less convenient than BenQ's wireless dial
  • No auto-dimming — manually adjust when room conditions change

Bottom line

Our pick: BenQ ScreenBar Halo. It edges out the alternative on rgb backlight behind the monitor fills wall bias lighting — reduces the screen/ambient contrast that causes eye fatigue during long sessions. That said, Xiaomi Mi Monitor Light Bar still wins on $35 vs $219 — delivers the same asymmetric front task lighting with no screen glare at 16% of benq's price — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.

Browse all comparisons | Trending