Baratza Encore vs Fellow Opus
By Billy G. · Founder & Lead EditorVerified Jun 2 by Billy G.
Baratza Encore
Baratza Encore
vs
Fellow Opus
Verdict: The Fellow Opus edges out the Encore for espresso capability and grind range; the Encore wins on repairability and long-term serviceability.
How we scored it
Spec verificationOwner sentimentLive pricing (4h refresh)Editorial review
Our methodology →
Winner: Fellow Opus
Baratza Encore: 7.5/10
Fellow Opus: 8/10
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Baratza Encore | Fellow Opus |
|---|
| Burr Size | 40mm conical (Baratza) | 40mm conical (SSP) |
|---|
| Grind Settings | 40 steps | 41 steps + espresso mode |
|---|
| Repairability | Excellent — full parts catalog | Good — growing parts availability |
|---|
| Espresso Range | Adequate for medium/dark | Extended — finer for light roasts |
|---|
| Hopper Capacity | 230g | 150g |
|---|
| Price | ~$170 | ~$195 |
|---|
Baratza Encore
What works
- Unmatched repairability — every part available for $5-50 from Baratza directly
- Decade-long reliability track record at scale
- Excellent filter coffee grind quality for pour-over and drip
What doesn't
- Finest setting too coarse for some espresso machines with light roasts
- Older burr design produces more fines than Opus's SSP burrs
- Utilitarian aesthetic — purely functional, no design consideration
Fellow Opus
What works
- SSP-manufactured burrs produce lower fines and better particle distribution
- Extended espresso range reaches finer settings the Encore cannot hit
- More attractive design — matte-black finish over utilitarian gray plastic
What doesn't
- Newer product — long-term repairability and parts availability not yet proven
- Slightly more expensive at ~$195 vs Encore's ~$170
- Less established repair ecosystem compared to Baratza's decades of support
Bottom line
Our pick: Fellow Opus.
View full comparison on GoodPickr
Related Comparisons
Browse all comparisons
View Interactive Comparison →
GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons