Audeze LCD-X vs Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro

Audeze LCD-X wins — Audeze LCD-X outperforms on resolution and soundstage width according to Audio Science Review and RTINGS data, but trail…

Scores: Audeze LCD-X 8.5/10 · Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro 7.5/10

Audeze LCD-X outperforms on resolution and soundstage width according to Audio Science Review and RTINGS data, but trails in comfort due to its 600 g weight versus the DT 1990 Pro's 370 g. The DT 1990 Pro provides stronger value and durability for tracking work per CNET and Wirecutter comparisons. LCD-X wins for audiophile listening while DT 1990 Pro suits studio monitoring better.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Audeze LCD-XBeyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro
Driver TypePlanar MagneticDynamic
Impedance20 ohms250 ohms
Weight600 g370 g
Frequency Response10 Hz - 50 kHz5 Hz - 40 kHz

Audeze LCD-X

What works

  • Superior detail retrieval and resolution
  • Expansive and accurate soundstage
  • Low distortion across frequencies

What doesn't

  • Heavy at 600 g for extended wear
  • Needs dedicated amplification

Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro

What works

  • Bright analytical treble detail
  • Durable metal construction
  • Lighter weight for all-day use

What doesn't

  • Can sound harsh in upper frequencies
  • Narrower soundstage than planars

Bottom line

Our pick: Audeze LCD-X.

Browse all comparisons | Trending

Built by Golden Consulting Partners