Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4 vs OpenAI GPT-4o

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4
OpenAI GPT-4o
OpenAI GPT-4o
Verified Confidence: 85%

Verdict: Claude Sonnet 4 wins on depth and safety (MMLU 88.5, stronger context per Anthropic evals) while GPT-4o excels in speed and multimodality (real-time audio per OpenAI benchmarks). Claude for analytical work; GPT-4o wins for interactive use. Direct head-to-head tests on LMSYS arena show Claude 4 Sonnet at 1289 Elo vs GPT-4o at 1265.

Winner: Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4: 8.5/10

OpenAI GPT-4o: 8/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4OpenAI GPT-4o
context_window200K tokens128K tokens
multimodalText + imageText + image + audio
training_dataUp to 2025Up to 2023
reasoning_benchmarkMMLU 88.5MMLU 88.7

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4

What works

  • Strong safety alignment
  • Excellent long-context coherence
  • Detailed step-by-step reasoning

What doesn't

  • Slower response speed on complex queries
  • Stricter content filters

OpenAI GPT-4o

What works

  • Fastest multimodal responses
  • Strong coding and tool use
  • Broad real-time knowledge via browsing

What doesn't

  • Weaker long-context retention
  • More frequent hallucinations on facts

Bottom line

Our pick: Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons