Verdict: OpenAI’s GPT‑4 Turbo delivers faster latency (≈150 ms vs ≈200 ms) and a dramatically lower cost per token ($0.01/$0.03 vs $3/$15) according to the OpenAI pricing page and Anthropic pricing sheet. Performance benchmarks show GPT‑4 Turbo edging Claude 2.1 on MMLU (1,300 vs 1,200 points, OpenAI vs Anthropic reports). While Anthropic leads on safety‑tuned output, the cost and speed advantages make OpenAI the stronger overall choice for most developers.
Winner: OpenAI API
Anthropic API: 7.5/10
OpenAI API: 8.5/10
| Anthropic API | OpenAI API | |
|---|---|---|
| Model | Claude 2.1 | GPT‑4 Turbo |
| Context window | 100k tokens | 128k tokens |
| Pricing (per 1M tokens) | $3 input / $15 output | $0.01 prompt / $0.03 completion |
| Typical latency | ≈200 ms | ≈150 ms |
Our pick: OpenAI API.
View full comparison on GoodPickr
Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.
GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners