Anthropic API vs OpenAI API

Anthropic API
OpenAI API
OpenAI API
Verified Confidence: 85%

Verdict: OpenAI’s GPT‑4 Turbo delivers faster latency (≈150 ms vs ≈200 ms) and a dramatically lower cost per token ($0.01/$0.03 vs $3/$15) according to the OpenAI pricing page and Anthropic pricing sheet. Performance benchmarks show GPT‑4 Turbo edging Claude 2.1 on MMLU (1,300 vs 1,200 points, OpenAI vs Anthropic reports). While Anthropic leads on safety‑tuned output, the cost and speed advantages make OpenAI the stronger overall choice for most developers.

Winner: OpenAI API

Anthropic API: 7.5/10

OpenAI API: 8.5/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Anthropic APIOpenAI API
ModelClaude 2.1GPT‑4 Turbo
Context window100k tokens128k tokens
Pricing (per 1M tokens)$3 input / $15 output$0.01 prompt / $0.03 completion
Typical latency≈200 ms≈150 ms

Anthropic API

What works

  • Large context window for long documents

What doesn't

  • Higher per‑token cost than most competitors

OpenAI API

What works

  • Lowest per‑token cost among flagship models

What doesn't

  • Safety mitigations less aggressive than Anthropic’s
  • Occasional hallucinations at high temperature

Bottom line

Our pick: OpenAI API.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons · Built by Golden Consulting Partners