Honda Civic 2017 vs Honda Civic 2016

Verdict: The Honda Civic 2017 and Honda Civic 2016 are nearly identical in performance, with both offering a base 158 hp engine and a turbocharged 174 hp option, as well as matching 5-star NHTSA safety ratings. The 2016 edges out slightly on fuel economy with 31 mpg city / 41 mpg highway versus the 2017’s 31 mpg city / 40 mpg highway, per Edmunds data, but the difference is negligible. Compared to a rival like the 2017 Mazda3, both Civics lag in power (184 hp in Mazda3) and cargo utility (15.1 cu ft vs Mazda3’s 12.4 cu ft but better rear seat access), making this a close call with no clear winner.

Winner: Honda Civic 2017

Honda Civic 2017: 6/10

Honda Civic 2016: 6/10

Honda Civic 2017 Pros

• Strong fuel economy at 31 mpg city and 40 mpg highway with the base engine, per Edmunds testing
• High safety ratings with a 5-star NHTSA overall score for 2017 models
• Spirited driving dynamics noted by Car and Driver for responsive handling

Honda Civic 2016 Pros

• Excellent fuel economy at 31 mpg city and 41 mpg highway with the base engine, per Edmunds data
• Top safety ratings with a 5-star NHTSA overall score for 2016 models
• Redesigned for 2016 with improved interior quality, as noted by U.S. News reviews

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

GoodPickr · AI-powered product comparisons