TCL QM8 vs Hisense U8N

By Billy G. · Founder & Lead EditorVerified May 18 by Billy G.

TCL QM8
TCL QM8
Hisense U8N

Verdict: The TCL QM8 wins on brightness and gaming; the Hisense U8N punches back with better out-of-box accuracy and a wider size range.

Winner: TCL QM8

TCL QM8: 7.5/10

Hisense U8N: 6.6/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

TCL QM8Hisense U8N
Panel TypeMini-LED QLEDMini-LED ULED
Peak HDR Brightness~2,200 nits~1,800 nits
Max Refresh Rate144Hz144Hz
Smart OSGoogle TVVIDAA U7
VRR SupportYesYes
Dolby VisionYesYes

TCL QM8

What works

  • Peak brightness around 2,200 nits — exceptional for the price
  • 4K/144Hz gaming at under $1,200 is extraordinary value
  • Google TV with Chromecast built-in

What doesn't

  • Runs slightly warm out-of-box — needs calibration for accuracy
  • Build quality trails more premium competitors
  • Fan noise reported by some users in demanding HDR scenes

Hisense U8N

What works

  • Better out-of-box color accuracy in Cinema mode
  • Available in a wider size range including 100"
  • IMAX Enhanced certification on select content

What doesn't

  • Lower peak brightness than QM8 (~1,800 vs ~2,200 nits)
  • VIDAA UI is less polished than Google TV
  • Input lag in game mode is good but trails QM8 slightly

Bottom line

Our pick: TCL QM8. It edges out the alternative on peak brightness around 2,200 nits — exceptional for the price. That said, Hisense U8N still wins on better out-of-box color accuracy in cinema mode — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons