Ricoh GR III vs Sony FX30

By Billy G. · Founder & Lead EditorVerified Jun 4 by Billy G.

Ricoh GR III
Sony FX30
Sony FX30
Verified Confidence: 83%

Verdict: The Ricoh GR III and Sony FX30 target entirely different workflows. The FX30's 20.1MP BIONZ XR sensor with 4K120p 10-bit 4:2:2 and 16-bit RAW output (per Sony specs) makes it the clear video tool, while the GR III's 24MP fixed-lens design excels only for pocketable stills. Sony wins four of six score categories by wide margins in performance and features.

Winner: Sony FX30

Ricoh GR III: 5.5/10

Sony FX30: 8/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Ricoh GR IIISony FX30
Sensor24.2MP APS-C CMOS20.1MP APS-C Exmor R CMOS
Video Capability1080p 60fps4K 120p 10-bit 4:2:2
Form FactorPocketable fixed-lensCinema body with XLR handle option
Lens28mm f/2.8 equivalentE-mount interchangeable

Ricoh GR III

What works

  • Extremely compact and lightweight at 257g
  • Excellent high-ISO stills performance
  • Fast hybrid AF for street photography

What doesn't

  • Limited to 1080p video only
  • No IBIS or weather sealing

Sony FX30

What works

  • 16-bit RAW output over HDMI
  • Advanced video features including S-Cinetone
  • Robust build with active cooling

What doesn't

  • No built-in EVF or flash
  • Higher price for stills-only users

Bottom line

Our pick: Sony FX30.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons