Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart 9500 vs Waterpik Sonic Fusion 2.0 Flossing Toothbrush

Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart 9500
Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart 9500
Waterpik Sonic Fusion 2.0 Flossing Toothbrush
Waterpik Sonic Fusion 2.0 Flossing Toothbrush
Verified Confidence: 84%

Verdict: Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart 9500 outperforms on brushing efficacy with 62000 strokes per minute and app tracking per clinical data from sources like Consumer Reports. Waterpik Sonic Fusion 2.0 provides the only integrated water flossing option reducing need for separate devices. Sonicare takes the win for dedicated brushing performance while Sonic Fusion suits combined oral care routines.

Winner: Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart 9500

Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart 9500: 8.5/10

Waterpik Sonic Fusion 2.0 Flossing Toothbrush: 7.5/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart 9500Waterpik Sonic Fusion 2.0 Flossing Toothbrush
Brush TechnologySonic 62000 strokes/minSonic 31000 strokes/min
Flossing IntegrationNoneBuilt-in water flosser
Smart FeaturesBluetooth app with coachingNone
Battery LifeUp to 3 weeksLithium-ion

Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart 9500

What works

  • Superior plaque removal per clinical trials
  • Multiple brushing modes including Gum Care
  • Premium travel case with UV sanitizer

What doesn't

  • Higher replacement brush head cost

Waterpik Sonic Fusion 2.0 Flossing Toothbrush

What works

  • Combines brushing and water flossing in one device
  • Effective for users with braces or implants

What doesn't

  • Lower brush stroke rate than premium sonics
  • Requires regular water reservoir refills

Bottom line

Our pick: Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Smart 9500.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons