Patagonia Nano Puff Hoody vs Arc'teryx Atom LT Hoody

Patagonia Nano Puff Hoody
Arc'teryx Atom LT Hoody

Verdict: The Arc'teryx Atom LT Hoody wins for active users needing durability and mobility, backed by higher scores in performance, quality, and longevity from sources like Outdoor Gear Lab and Switchback Travel. Patagonia Nano Puff Hoody provides strong value for casual wear and travel with its packability and eco-materials per REI feedback. Choose based on whether your priority is technical performance or everyday affordability.

Winner: Arc'teryx Atom LT Hoody

Patagonia Nano Puff Hoody: 7.5/10

Arc'teryx Atom LT Hoody: 8.5/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Patagonia Nano Puff HoodyArc'teryx Atom LT Hoody
Weight12.5 oz13.4 oz
InsulationPrimaLoft Gold EcoCoreloft 60/80
Water ResistanceDWR finishDWR finish with reinforced shoulders
FitRegularAthletic

Patagonia Nano Puff Hoody

What works

  • Highly packable into its own pocket
  • Uses recycled materials throughout
  • Excellent warmth-to-weight ratio for casual use

What doesn't

  • Shell fabric shows wear faster than competitors
  • Less structured hood in wind

Arc'teryx Atom LT Hoody

What works

  • Highly durable face fabric and construction
  • Articulated patterning for mobility
  • Versatile for active outdoor use

What doesn't

  • Less compressible than puffier alternatives
  • Premium pricing

Bottom line

Our pick: Arc'teryx Atom LT Hoody. It edges out the alternative on highly durable face fabric and construction. That said, Patagonia Nano Puff Hoody still wins on highly packable into its own pocket — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons