By Billy G. · Founder & Lead EditorVerified May 21 by Billy G.
Nike Metcon 9vs
Reebok Nano X4
Reebok Nano X4
Worth-It Score: 74/100WAITNike Metcon 9 scores well, but current pricing sits above our fair-price band. Wait for a price drop before pulling the trigger.
✓VerifiedConfidence: 83%
Verdict: The Nike Metcon 9 wins for dedicated CrossFit athletes needing max stability, with 4 mm drop and reinforced heel per Runner's World reviews. The Reebok Nano X4 provides softer Floatride Energy cushioning that reduces impact on high-volume days but sacrifices some rigidity. Both shoes excel in mixed training yet the Metcon's durability edge makes it the stronger long-term pick.
How we scored itSpec verificationOwner sentimentLive pricing (4h refresh)Editorial reviewOur methodology →
Winner: Nike Metcon 9
Nike Metcon 9: 8.5/10
Reebok Nano X4: 7.5/10
Spec-by-spec comparison
Nike Metcon 9
Reebok Nano X4
Weight
10.5 oz
11.2 oz
Heel-to-toe drop
4 mm
6 mm
Cushioning
React foam midsole
Floatride Energy foam
Upper material
Engineered mesh
Flexweave knit
Nike Metcon 9
What works
Superior lateral stability for Olympic lifts
Durable rubber outsole with rope-grip zones
Responsive React foam for explosive movements
What doesn't
Stiffer break-in period than competitors
Less plush underfoot cushioning for long runs
Reebok Nano X4
What works
Softer landing for high-rep workouts
Versatile for running and lifting
Lightweight knit upper improves breathability
What doesn't
Less rigid heel counter for heavy squats
Outsole wears faster on abrasive surfaces
Bottom line
Our pick: Nike Metcon 9. It edges out the alternative on superior lateral stability for olympic lifts. That said, Reebok Nano X4 still wins on softer landing for high-rep workouts — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.