EarFun Air S vs Technics EAH-AZ60M2

EarFun Air S
EarFun Air S
Technics EAH-AZ60M2

Verdict: The Technics EAH-AZ60M2 wins on performance with its 20Hz-40kHz frequency response and Dual Hybrid Noise Cancelling (per grounded facts) but trails badly on value against the EarFun Air S's $90 price and 30-hour total playtime. EarFun provides IPX5 resistance versus IPX4 while Technics offers Bluetooth 5.3 over 5.2. For most users the EarFun Air S is the unless premium ANC and frequency detail are priorities.

EarFun Air S lists at $90 while Technics EAH-AZ60M2 lists at $249 — EarFun Air S undercuts Technics EAH-AZ60M2 by $159 (177%).

Winner: Technics EAH-AZ60M2

EarFun Air S: 7.5/10

Technics EAH-AZ60M2: 8/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

EarFun Air STechnics EAH-AZ60M2
Bluetooth Version5.25.3
Driver Size10mm wool composite8mm
Battery Life (ANC On)30 hours total7 hours
Water ResistanceIPX5IPX4

EarFun Air S

What works

  • 30 hours total playtime with ANC
  • 10mm drivers for fuller sound
  • IPX5 rating for better sweat resistance

What doesn't

  • Bluetooth 5.2 lacks latest efficiency
  • No frequency response listed beyond basic ANC

Technics EAH-AZ60M2

What works

  • Bluetooth 5.3 with 20Hz-40kHz response
  • Dual Hybrid Noise Cancelling
  • Premium build from Technics

What doesn't

  • Only 7 hours battery with ANC on
  • IPX4 offers less water protection than IPX5

Bottom line

Our pick: Technics EAH-AZ60M2.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

Affiliate disclosure: GoodPickr may earn a commission from qualifying purchases made through partner links on this page. Verdicts are editorially independent and never influenced by affiliate relationships.

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons