By Billy G. · Founder & Lead EditorVerified May 21 by Billy G.
Dell UltraSharp U3225QEvsLG 32UN880-B Ergo
Worth-It Score: 75/100WAITDell UltraSharp U3225QE scores well, but current pricing sits above our fair-price band. Wait for a price drop before pulling the trigger.
Verdict: The Dell UltraSharp U3225QE leads for office and creative workflows thanks to its 90W USB-C hub and KVM (per RTINGS and Dell specs), while the LG 32UN880-B Ergo excels in pure adjustability with its unique stand that extends and retracts. Dell scores higher overall on features and quality but costs more; choose LG if desk ergonomics are the top priority and budget is under $600.
How we scored itSpec verificationOwner sentimentLive pricing (4h refresh)Editorial reviewOur methodology →
Winner: Dell UltraSharp U3225QE
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE: 8.5/10
LG 32UN880-B Ergo: 7.5/10
Spec-by-spec comparison
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE
LG 32UN880-B Ergo
screen_size
32 inches
32 inches
resolution
3840x2160
3840x2160
panel_type
IPS
IPS
refresh_rate
60 Hz
60 Hz
Dell UltraSharp U3225QE
What works
Extensive USB-C hub with 90W power delivery and multiple downstream ports
Factory-calibrated 99% sRGB and 99% Rec.709 coverage
Built-in KVM switch for dual-PC control
What doesn't
60 Hz refresh rate limits gaming fluidity
Higher price than basic 4K monitors
LG 32UN880-B Ergo
What works
Highly adjustable Ergo stand with height, tilt, swivel and extend/retract
USB-C with 60W power delivery and built-in speakers
Lower price point for a 4K ergonomic monitor
What doesn't
Fewer downstream USB ports than Dell hub models
Color gamut coverage is standard sRGB only
Bottom line
Our pick: Dell UltraSharp U3225QE. It edges out the alternative on extensive usb-c hub with 90w power delivery and multiple downstream ports. That said, LG 32UN880-B Ergo still wins on highly adjustable ergo stand with height, tilt, swivel and extend/retract — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.