Concept2 RowErg vs WaterRower Classic

Concept2 RowErg
Concept2 RowErg
WaterRower Classic

Verdict: The Concept2 RowErg wins for performance tracking, athletic training, and cost. The WaterRower Classic wins for aesthetics, the unique water resistance feel, and for buyers who want a rowing machine that doesn't look out of place in a living room. Both are excellent. The right choice depends on whether you prioritize athletic metrics or the experience of rowing itself.

Winner: Concept2 RowErg

Concept2 RowErg: 8.1/10

WaterRower Classic: 6.5/10

Spec-by-spec comparison

Concept2 RowErgWaterRower Classic
Resistance TypeAir flywheelWater flywheel
MonitorPM5Series 4 Performance Monitor
Frame MaterialSteel/aluminumSolid ash wood
Machine Weight57 lbs~117 lbs (with water)
Max User Weight500 lbs700 lbs
Upright Storage Footprint~27" x 27"21" x 22"

Concept2 RowErg

What works

  • PM5 monitor is the gold standard for rowing metrics
  • Air resistance scales precisely with effort
  • Lighter (57 lbs) and separates for easier storage

What doesn't

  • Air flywheel is louder than water resistance
  • Industrial appearance doesn't suit all home spaces
  • PM5 monitor is functional, not beautiful

WaterRower Classic

What works

  • Water resistance has a uniquely fluid, enjoyable feel
  • Ash wood construction looks like furniture
  • Calming water sound during rowing

What doesn't

  • Series 4 monitor lacks PM5's precision and ecosystem
  • Heavier (~117 lbs full with water)
  • Wood requires protection from sustained sunlight

Bottom line

Our pick: Concept2 RowErg. It edges out the alternative on pm5 monitor is the gold standard for rowing metrics. That said, WaterRower Classic still wins on water resistance has a uniquely fluid, enjoyable feel — consider it if that single trade matters most for your use.

View full comparison on GoodPickr

Related Comparisons

People also compared

Browse all comparisons

View Interactive Comparison →

GoodPickr · Data-backed product comparisons